In this paper we present a comparison between various statistical descriptors and analyze their goodness in classifying textural images. The chosen statistical descriptors have been proposed by Tamura, Battiato and Haralick. In this work we also test a combination of the three descriptors for texture analysis. The databases used in our study are the well-known Brodatz’s album and DDSM(Heath et al., 1998). The computed features are classified using the Naive Bayes, the RBF, the KNN, the Random Forest and Random Tree models. The results obtained from this study show that we can achieve a high classification accuracy if the descriptors are used all together.

Statistical Features for Image Retrieval: A Quantitative Comparison

DI RUBERTO, CECILIA;
2014-01-01

Abstract

In this paper we present a comparison between various statistical descriptors and analyze their goodness in classifying textural images. The chosen statistical descriptors have been proposed by Tamura, Battiato and Haralick. In this work we also test a combination of the three descriptors for texture analysis. The databases used in our study are the well-known Brodatz’s album and DDSM(Heath et al., 1998). The computed features are classified using the Naive Bayes, the RBF, the KNN, the Random Forest and Random Tree models. The results obtained from this study show that we can achieve a high classification accuracy if the descriptors are used all together.
2014
978-989-758-003-1
Texture; Feature Extraction; Feature Selection
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VISAPP2014_1_open.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: versione post-print
Dimensione 228.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
228.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/55927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact