It is generally assumed that two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) recently observed at the (001) SrTiO3 surface can be solely derived by oxygen vacancies introduced during ultrahigh vacuum annealing or through ultraviolet irradiation exposure. However, 2DEG entirely due to defect formation may be at odds with the characteristics of high mobility and easy field-effect manipulation required for applications; to that aim, an intrinsic formation mechanism should be preferred. Using advanced ab initio simulations we give evidence that 2DEG at the (001) SrTiO3 surface may even result from purely intrinsic properties of the pristine surface, provided that the surface is SrO terminated. The key concept is that the SrO termination is electron-attractive as a consequence of both the surface-induced polarity and the specific electronic reconstruction, whereas the TiO2 termination is electron-repulsive. It follows that in vacuum-cleaved samples where both terminations are present, 2DEG can result from the structurally ordered superposition of the two kinds of domain, even in the absence of any extrinsic source. On the other hand, in etching-prepared single-terminated TiO2 samples 2DEG should be assumed as entirely derived by extrinsic factors.

Intrinsic origin of the 2D electron gas at the (001) surface of SrTiO3

FIORENTINI, VINCENZO;FILIPPETTI, ALESSIO
2015-01-01

Abstract

It is generally assumed that two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) recently observed at the (001) SrTiO3 surface can be solely derived by oxygen vacancies introduced during ultrahigh vacuum annealing or through ultraviolet irradiation exposure. However, 2DEG entirely due to defect formation may be at odds with the characteristics of high mobility and easy field-effect manipulation required for applications; to that aim, an intrinsic formation mechanism should be preferred. Using advanced ab initio simulations we give evidence that 2DEG at the (001) SrTiO3 surface may even result from purely intrinsic properties of the pristine surface, provided that the surface is SrO terminated. The key concept is that the SrO termination is electron-attractive as a consequence of both the surface-induced polarity and the specific electronic reconstruction, whereas the TiO2 termination is electron-repulsive. It follows that in vacuum-cleaved samples where both terminations are present, 2DEG can result from the structurally ordered superposition of the two kinds of domain, even in the absence of any extrinsic source. On the other hand, in etching-prepared single-terminated TiO2 samples 2DEG should be assumed as entirely derived by extrinsic factors.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Delugas PRB 91 2015.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 4.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.73 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/61221
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact