<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T04:28:50Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266376" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266376</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-20T09:37:04Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>L'azione economica tra etica e neurobiologia</dc:title>
<dc:creator>MURINO, ANTONELLA</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cervello</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>decision</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>decisione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>economia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ethic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>etica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mente</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mind</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>scelta</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The heated debate over the conflict between ethics and economics is often described&#xd;
as an epochal issue, an expression of present-day fragility, resulting from the&#xd;
implosion of the development model, which has characterised western society.&#xd;
The debate, however, exposes a paradox. Whilst, on the one hand, the neoclassical&#xd;
economic theory is radically criticized, on the other such criticism does not appear to&#xd;
delineate any solid, practicable alternative. Thus, the mainstream economic theory is&#xd;
still taught, practised by individuals as well as institutions, and further developed by&#xd;
the prevailing academic research.&#xd;
For this reason, a viable alternative needs to be sought, along with a new research&#xd;
methodology, which would allow to apply novel and more coherent theoretical&#xd;
assumptions into effective research and real cases.&#xd;
The theoretical instruments by which to create the models for human behaviour&#xd;
need to take into account the biological foundation of behaviour, expressed in&#xd;
evolutionary genetics terms.&#xd;
The aim of this paper is to establish whether our moral knowledge of economics&#xd;
may claim any scientific objectivity in light of advances in subject areas that differ in&#xd;
their scope and methods: moral philosophy, economics, cognitive neuroscience and&#xd;
artificial intelligence, each of which makes a specific contribution to understanding&#xd;
the operation of the human mind and towards forming the moral values onto which&#xd;
economic choice and action are founded.&#xd;
Given that the object of the study of economic science is the analysis of complex&#xd;
systems, nowadays the most efficient method seems to be artificial life simulation.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2015-05-15</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266376</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:167</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>