<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T16:21:43Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266497" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266497</identifier><datestamp>2025-06-13T02:25:50Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Tra l’umano e il divino: la divinazione in Giamblico. Un&#xd;
commentario al terzo libro del De mysteriis.</dc:title>
<dc:creator>CHESSA, PIETRO</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>De misteriis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Divination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Giamblico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore M-FIL/07 - Storia della Filosofia Antica</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Divination is the leitmotif of this essay. I tried to analyze this subjet that the main&#xd;
thinkers and philosophers point out as the key-subject of the neoplatonic sage&#xd;
Giambilico's Treatise On the Mysteries of Egyptians. It is a ten books work and the third&#xd;
one was totally focused on Divination by the Author. Here he refutes and debates&#xd;
Porfirio's objections about the nature, the shapes and the teurgic aims the divination&#xd;
art can have. This essay follows the studying method already used in the Comment of&#xd;
the Book III of the Treatise On the Mysteries of Egyptians: in this way i tried to show up&#xd;
and present a fresco about the wide variety of theories, doctrines and contradictions&#xd;
about this subject and describe an original complete critic structure, that you cannot&#xd;
find in other essays about this theme. The core-subject of this debate is the&#xd;
dissertation of Portirio's theory that we can read in the Letter to Anebo: here the&#xd;
philosopher describes the divination origin as a complete natural origin, based on&#xd;
psyco-physiological mood and inclinations of a typical soothsayer. Giambilico opposes&#xd;
his idea to Portirios's, and he elevates the role of the medium from the soothsayer&#xd;
attitude to the Supernatural, far from a mixture based on the human level and&#xd;
existence.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2014-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266497</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:219</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>