<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-25T02:57:46Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266548" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266548</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-15T19:57:07Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Sistemi di appropriazione e approcci alla riqualificazione delle megastrutture per l'edilizia residenziale pubblica negli anni 60-70. Il caso del quartiere Sant’Elia a Cagliari</dc:title>
<dc:creator>FOIS, SARA</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>appropriation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>appropriazione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>edilizia pubblica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>living space</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>megastructures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>megastrutture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>redevelopment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>riqualificazione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>social housing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>spazio vissuto</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore ICAR/14 - Composizione Architettonica e Urbana</dc:subject>
<dc:description>This research investigates the issue of megastructures for public housing built in Italy in the 1960s and 1970s,&#xd;
after the enactment of the law n. 167/1962 “Disposizioni per favorire l’acquisizione di aree fabbricabili per&#xd;
l’edilizia economica e popolare”. Based on urban theories elaborated in that period and based on the&#xd;
proposition that large-scale housing schemes can create new parts of the city, these estates have attracted&#xd;
strongly negative criticism. In reality they created mono-functional places where urban and social degradation&#xd;
became quite evident. The question of demolition/reconstruction has been discussed several times but today is&#xd;
an option considered not sustainable. The megastructures for public housing are urban utopias not completed&#xd;
because they were built without public services that would have created a high quality of life. As a consequence&#xd;
of the "unfinished", and because of the large scale of the space and the architectural language, they went&#xd;
through a gradual transformation from “conceived space” to “living space” thanks to the inhabitants that tried&#xd;
to satisfy their needs and desires.&#xd;
The study starts from the assumption that the relation between the original design proposal and the “practices&#xd;
of appropriation” can generate inputs for a redevelopment that considers what is already in place. The main&#xd;
objective is to propose a methodology for the analysis of the current condition that considers the relationship&#xd;
between space and inhabitant.&#xd;
After having analysed similar approaches and having investigated the concept of appropriation and the&#xd;
contemporary strategies for the redevelopment of two case studies (the city-building Corviale in Rome and the&#xd;
neighborhood-city Toulouse-Le Mirail), the research proposes a methodology applied to the Sant'Elia housing&#xd;
estate in Cagliari (Sardinia).&#xd;
The Sant’Elia housing estate, result of the urban experiments of the 1960s and 1970s, has always lived a state&#xd;
of urban blight, social decay, and a condition of "otherness" than the rest of the city. In response to this&#xd;
condition many redevelopment projects have been proposed. Several proposals remained on paper, so they&#xd;
have caused a sense of abandonment in the inhabitants. Nevertheless they show a sense of belonging to the&#xd;
place. The buildings were designed for a generic inhabitant and people who are now living there adapted them&#xd;
to their needs. These modifications, carried out to varying degrees of alteration, express their needs and wants,&#xd;
which the original project and the following transformations have not considered. Through analysing the space&#xd;
of living proposed by the original project, the “controlled transformations” and the “signs of appropriation”&#xd;
(transformations not controlled), the work comes to a critique of the recent master plan for the redevelopment&#xd;
of the Sant'Elia neighbourhood. Finally, the research offers some thoughts for a redevelopment that take into&#xd;
account the transformations initiated by “the action of living”.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2014-05-16</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266548</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:566</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>