<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T06:32:27Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266647" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266647</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-20T09:30:30Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Mediation analysis for different types of Causal questions: Effect of Cause and Cause of Effect</dc:title>
<dc:creator>MURTAS, ROSSELLA</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>causal interference</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cause of effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>effect of cause</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mediation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>probability of causation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore SECS-S/01 - Statistica</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Many statistical analyses aim at a causal explanation of the data. When discussing&#xd;
this topic it is important to specify the exact query we want to talk about. A&#xd;
typical causal question can be categorized in two main classes: questions on the&#xd;
causes of observed effects and questions on the effects of observed causes. In this&#xd;
dissertation we consider both EoC and CoE causal queries from a particular perspective&#xd;
that is Mediation. Mediation Analysis aims to disentangle the pathway&#xd;
between exposure and outcome on a direct effect and an indirect effect arising from&#xd;
the chain exposure-mediator-outcome. In the EoC framework, if the goal is to measure&#xd;
the causal relation between two variables when a third is involved and plays&#xd;
the role of mediator, it is essential to explicitly define several assumptions among&#xd;
variables. However if any of these assumptions is not met, estimates of mediating&#xd;
effects may be affected by bias. This phenomenon, known with the name of Birth&#xd;
Weight paradox, has been explained as a consequence of the presence of unmeasured&#xd;
confounding between the mediator and the outcome. In this thesis we discuss these&#xd;
apparent paradoxical results in a real dataset. In addition we suggest useful graphical&#xd;
sensitivity analysis techniques to explain the potential amount of bias capable&#xd;
of producing these paradoxical results. From a CoE perspective, given empirical&#xd;
evidence for the dependence of an outcome variable on an exposure variable, we&#xd;
can typically only provide bounds for the “probability of causation” in the case of&#xd;
an individual who has developed the outcome after being exposed. We show how&#xd;
these bounds can be adapted or improved if further information becomes available.&#xd;
In addition to reviewing existing work on this topic, we provide a new analysis for&#xd;
the case where a mediating variable can be observed. In particular we show how&#xd;
the probability of causation can be bounded in two different cases of partial and&#xd;
complete mediation.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2016-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266647</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:150</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>