<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T02:45:22Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266713" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266713</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-17T10:44:54Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>La democrazia partecipativa:tendenze all’istituzionalizzazione</dc:title>
<dc:creator>DIANA, IACOPO LUCA</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>democrazia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>democrazia partecipativa</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>dibattito pubblico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e-participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>institutionalisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>istituzionalizzazione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>partecipazione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>participatory democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore IUS/10 - Diritto Amministrativo</dc:subject>
<dc:description>This thesis aims to analyse the participatory democracy taking the perspective of one&#xd;
of the tendencies that cross it: the institutionalisation. Given the premise of a juridical&#xd;
approach to this multidisciplinary subject, the work suggest the adoption of a strict&#xd;
concept of participatory democracy and his instruments, than follows its path over the&#xd;
years throughout different experiences. Having found various degrees of&#xd;
institutionalisation as well as an opposing tension in order to not overregulate the&#xd;
participation, the analysis focus on the French débat public as one of the most&#xd;
accomplished examples of how a participatory instrument with a strong legislative&#xd;
basis can maintain, at the same time, a flexible procedure.&#xd;
Proceeding along this trace the attention shifts to the peculiar status of the&#xd;
participatory democracy in the Italian system. The work sustains the positive value of&#xd;
an institutionalisation’s process, suggesting the introduction of a national law on the&#xd;
citizens’ participation to the public policy-making process. Furthermore it is given an&#xd;
evaluation of the e-democracy set of problems as a consequence of the growing&#xd;
impact of the ICT in this field.&#xd;
In conclusion this research confirms the existence of some strong tendencies to the&#xd;
institutionalisation. These should be carefully balanced, whenever it is decided to&#xd;
begin a participatory experience, so that its instruments could actually reach, in&#xd;
concrete, the theoretical premises brought by the participatory democracy.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2016-03-29</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266713</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:189</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>