<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T07:11:01Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266720" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266720</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-15T20:07:55Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>La qualificazione degli interessi plurisoggettivi e l’evoluzione dei mezzi di tutela nel sistema amministrativo</dc:title>
<dc:creator>PIRAS, CLAUDIA</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>collettive interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interessi collettivi</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore IUS/10 - Diritto Amministrativo</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Subjective legal positions are legally irrelevant firstly, because they have&#xd;
superindividual features and they do not refer to a specif subject.&#xd;
There are many legal scholars who have qualified the interests such as interests of a&#xd;
purely factual and they have started the discussion of legal consistency of common&#xd;
interests and arrangements of protection.&#xd;
Many docrtinal conflicts about protections way of collective interests started due to the&#xd;
conflicting between collective nature of the interests and personal nature of common&#xd;
interests.&#xd;
The problem of relevance has been overcame through the attribution of legal standing to&#xd;
exponential authorities, bearers of collective interests, then it has gone in search of the&#xd;
ways of protection both in procedural and in the judicial.&#xd;
Collective action that finds its most typical expression in the US class action has also&#xd;
been welcomed in our system and also with regard to public administration, aimed at&#xd;
overcoming the inefficiencies and reduce bureaucracy delays, with a view 'transparent&#xd;
administration and higher quality.&#xd;
In conclusion the discussion can be said dormant, because the common interest have&#xd;
been overcame instead the assimilation of the candidate positions is increasing, relied&#xd;
by collective bodies to individual rights.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2016-03-29</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266720</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:156</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>