<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T02:39:10Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266755" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266755</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-15T19:53:03Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>The nature of corporate entrepreneurship: theoretical&#xd;
and empirical insights</dc:title>
<dc:creator>ANGIONI, ENRICO</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>corporate entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>open innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>open strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore SECS-P/08 - Economia e Gestione delle Imprese</dc:subject>
<dc:description>This thesis consists of three essays linked to each other by perspectives of entrepreneurship,&#xd;
openness, and innovation, through which I sought to give an answer to a specific research question.&#xd;
Starting from the premise that corporate entrepreneurship should be understood as a renewal process of&#xd;
the existing organization that is aimed at maintaining and improving the competitive potential of a&#xd;
company in its environment, I have developed my research in order to give an answer to the following&#xd;
question: how does the evolution of the relationship between a company and external agents effect the&#xd;
inclination of the first one to innovate? According to this premise, in the first essay I analyzed the&#xd;
conceptual structure of corporate entrepreneurship in order to discover the core themes and limitations.&#xd;
In the second essay, according to results that emerged from the previous research, I have delivered a&#xd;
theoretical framework aimed to fulfill the limitations that emerged. In the third and last essay, I sought to&#xd;
demonstrate empirically the theoretical results that emerged in the previous essays, analyzing how&#xd;
relationships with external agents could affect the strategic innovation of a company.&#xd;
More specifically, the first essay aimed to reveal the conceptual structure map of the corporate&#xd;
entrepreneurship research field during the period 1992-2015. By adopting a co-word analysis approach&#xd;
and following the most rigorous methodological prescriptions, 43 main concepts were detected by&#xd;
filtering the co-occurrence of 654 normalized author’s keywords extracted from the Scopus database.&#xd;
Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling (MDS) were applied in order to gather and detect the&#xd;
concepts’ positioning, densities, distances, and gaps cartography. Based on these multivariate analyses, the&#xd;
following conclusions can be drawn: (i) the five main keyword groups of concepts are located in three&#xd;
areas: central, semi-peripheral and peripheral; (ii) innovation and strategy related concepts are central in&#xd;
the field; (iii) entrepreneurial leverages and entrepreneurialism focused on SME’s concepts are semiperipheral;&#xd;
(iv) organizational concepts related to learning and absorptive capacity, culture, human&#xd;
resources and cognition are largely decentralized and represent the emerging, hidden or peripheral topics.&#xd;
The second essay deals with the collaborative nature of corporate entrepreneurship and deepens the&#xd;
limitations that emerged from the previous analysis. In particular, the starting point has been the&#xd;
perspective that collaborative innovation with customers or external agents is increasingly important for&#xd;
the development of company innovation processes. Despite this critical role, how a customer’s&#xd;
collaborative relationship with a firm can be used to manage the innovation processes has received&#xd;
relatively little attention in the current corporate entrepreneurship literature. This analysis aims to reveal a&#xd;
theoretical framework that helps to fill a specific gap that has emerged in previous studies in this field,&#xd;
offering a theory of innovation that links this field of study with value co-creation and open innovation.&#xd;
By adopting a bibliometric analysis approach and following the most rigorous methodological&#xd;
prescriptions, the main concepts have been detected by the literature review of each field of study and a&#xd;
frequency of keywords analysis has been applied. Based on these analyses, the essay is divided into two&#xd;
studies. The first study provides a review of the literature from three existing fields of studies: corporate&#xd;
entrepreneurship, value co-creation, and open innovation, placing emphasis on how companies engage in&#xd;
collaborative innovation with external agents. The second study, using a multiple qualitative case study,&#xd;
shows how companies’ innovations are shaped by relationships with customers.&#xd;
The goal of the last essay is to demonstrate empirically the results that emerged in the previous essays&#xd;
in the field of companies’ openness. Since the last century, the increasing adoption of more open&#xd;
approaches to innovation has required firms to revise their traditional views of strategy. However,&#xd;
relatively little is known about how managers can go about achieving this transformation, and how—and&#xd;
to what extent—strategy should be adapted. This study, using a grounded-theory approach, investigates&#xd;
how and why forms of open strategy occur as a result of open innovation approaches. In particular, we&#xd;
identify the key dimensions that underpin open strategy. We discuss them in terms of innovation strategy,&#xd;
business complementarities, strategic fit and bidirectional communication. We also identify three different&#xd;
possible levels of open strategy: corporate, functional and business area. The results of our analysis: (i)&#xd;
highlight that the open innovation approach is a starting point for the process of open strategy, (ii) show&#xd;
to what extent an open innovation approach tends to influence and shape the strategy of a firm, and (iii)&#xd;
provide researchers with a framework that seeks to explain the key dimensions of open strategy.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2016-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266755</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:86</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>