<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T12:08:00Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266830" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/266830</identifier><datestamp>2022-10-20T09:19:58Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_265854</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia e Amministrazione nazionale: poteri, doveri e spunti per un’analisi comparata</dc:title>
<dc:creator>GIANNOTTE, ROBERTA PATRIZIA</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Corte di Giustizia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Court of Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lucchini</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Unione Europea</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United Kingdom</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>amministrazione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>autotutela</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>autotutela decisoria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>case law</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>diritto amministrativo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>giurisprudenza</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>jurisprudence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>precauzione</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore IUS/10 - Diritto Amministrativo</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Nowadays, a huge judicial phenomenon involves European Countries: the crisis of law. In particular, written law, as acts and regulaments, are losing importance, while case law and jugdements are enhancing their influence.&#xd;
Most of times, the domestic law of European countries is influnced by E.U. Court of Justice’s judgements.&#xd;
The European Court of Justice is very different from other courts, both domestic and international. Her original main role focused on uniform intepretation of European law.&#xd;
This function may be related just to intepretation of rules. But, sometimes, the Court also create rules and principles, that became self-executive in Member States.&#xd;
The Court of Justice, also, organised a “nomofilachia network” (as some Authors used to say), in which national courts and Public Administration provide to guarantee the uniform intepretation and application of E.U. case law.&#xd;
Referring to Public Administrations, three types of competences can be clearly seen: the administrative re-examination of an anti-comunitarian decision, the positive execution of European judgements (that, many times, provide to extend citizens’ rights), the competence that involve the principle of precaution.&#xd;
The question is: has the European Court of Justice an administrative role? Is her function internal or only international?&#xd;
The thesis is completed by a brief comparate analysis about Court of Justice’s role in a common law Country and a civil law Country: United Kingdom and Spain.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2015-05-25</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266830</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>ita</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:135</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:Non specificato</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>