<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T15:51:59Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.unica.it:11584/395624" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.unica.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.unica.it:11584/395624</identifier><datestamp>2024-04-09T22:56:02Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11584_207615</setSpec><setSpec>com_11584_111066</setSpec><setSpec>col_11584_207612</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Predication in non-clausal domains: a configurational approach to Sanskrit bahuvrīhi compounds and their Italian equivalents</dc:title>
<dc:creator>MOCCI, DAVIDE</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Supervisor: A. Moro</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia e Linguistica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore L-OR/18 - Indologia e Tibetologia</dc:subject>
<dc:description>In the present thesis I offer a unified solution for the following two apparently unrelated puzzles: i. why &#xd;
is the internal order of Sanskrit bahuvrīhis with a nominal/ adjectival qualifier determined by the &#xd;
dependency holding between the bahuvrīhi’s external referent and one of the bahuvrīhi-members? ii. &#xd;
why can’t the adjective which realizes the complement-of-quality-internal qualifier in Italian be dropped &#xd;
or be of the non-predicative type? The unified solution becomes available when the syntactic and &#xd;
semantic relations involved in Sanskrit bahuvrīhis and in the Italian complement of quality are translated &#xd;
into configurational terms, and movement is intertwined with configurations (as in the theory of Dynamic &#xd;
Antisymmetry): the constraint on the internal order of Sanskrit bahuvrīhis and the constraint on the type &#xd;
of qualifier in the Italian complement of quality are both by-products of the filter on subextraction known &#xd;
as “Subjacency Condition”. More explicitly, the ill-formed internal orders of Sanskrit bahuvrīhis &#xd;
correspond to phrase markers where the filter on subextraction is violated; likewise, Italian complements &#xd;
of quality whose qualifier is dropped or is a non-predicative adjective correspond to phrase markers in &#xd;
which the filter on subextraction is violated.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2023-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/11584/395624</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>alleditors:Supervisor: A. Moro</dc:relation>
<dc:publisher>Università degli Studi di Cagliari</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>