According to Krugman, the central cause of the profession’s failure to forecast the current Great Crisis is the abandoning of Keynesian theory to explain crises and depressions, and the prevailing of monetarism and neoclassical vision that whatever happens in a market economy must be right. According to Neoclassicals, instead, economic models do not just fail to predict the timing of financial crises, they say that we cannot. This common sense is the heart of rational expectations models. So the correct conclusion should be that our inability to predict the crisis confirms Neoclassical theories. Keynesians suggest that deficit spending is the right policy to put the economic system in a full employment equilibrium path, while Neoclassicals think that fiscal stimulus is only a bad way to transfer money from taxpayers to inefficient bureaucrats, policymakers, and zombie firms. Anyway, Keynesians and Neoclassicals share the opinion that we need a more tightening regulation of financial markets. Commercial banks, who are allowed to manage systemic contracts like bank deposits, and for that reason they have access to the lender of last resort, should be kept strictly separated from investment banks, hedge funds and other financial speculative institutions, none of which should be considered too big to fail. This is the most important convergence between the two schools of thought.

The Theoretical Debate on the Great Crisis

MORO, BENIAMINO
2016-01-01

Abstract

According to Krugman, the central cause of the profession’s failure to forecast the current Great Crisis is the abandoning of Keynesian theory to explain crises and depressions, and the prevailing of monetarism and neoclassical vision that whatever happens in a market economy must be right. According to Neoclassicals, instead, economic models do not just fail to predict the timing of financial crises, they say that we cannot. This common sense is the heart of rational expectations models. So the correct conclusion should be that our inability to predict the crisis confirms Neoclassical theories. Keynesians suggest that deficit spending is the right policy to put the economic system in a full employment equilibrium path, while Neoclassicals think that fiscal stimulus is only a bad way to transfer money from taxpayers to inefficient bureaucrats, policymakers, and zombie firms. Anyway, Keynesians and Neoclassicals share the opinion that we need a more tightening regulation of financial markets. Commercial banks, who are allowed to manage systemic contracts like bank deposits, and for that reason they have access to the lender of last resort, should be kept strictly separated from investment banks, hedge funds and other financial speculative institutions, none of which should be considered too big to fail. This is the most important convergence between the two schools of thought.
2016
978-3-319-20990-6
978-3-319-20991-3
978-3-319-20990-6
978-3-319-20991-3
financial crisis, financial models, market failure, economic breakdown, systemic contracts.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Springer_Chapter 8_Moro_The theoretical debate on the recent Great Crisis.docx

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione pre-print
Dimensione 84.46 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
84.46 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/137790
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact