This volume presents a thematic rather than chronological study of the UK tabloid newspapers from the 1960s to the present day. The focus is on the use of language but the prose style is that of “popular linguistics”, accessible to a general readership as well to academics and university students. The analytical tools are those of Stylistics and Critical Discourse Analysis and texts are always considered with refence to historical and sociopolitical context. Although some unsigned editorials are analysed, the preference is for signed articles written by journalists or commentators whose career details, political allegiances and past controversies can be readily discovered. For pieces written since the digital revolution, readers’ online feedback is also considered. Such readers hide their identities behind a nickname and therefore are not constrained by the need to respect legislation regarding defamation and race relations; often they make explicit claims or accusations that professional journalists can only allude to. If certain highly offensive posts are published verbatim, it may say something about the newspaper concerned.

Questo volume presenta uno studio tematico ma non cronologico dei giornali popolari britannici (i “tabloid”) dagli anni ’60 del secolo scorso a tutt’oggi. Si focalizza sull’uso del linguaggio ma la prosa del volume è quella della “linguistica popolare”, accessibile non solo agli studiosi ma anche ai lettori non specializzati. Gli strumenti analitici adottati sono quelli della stilistica e della critical discourse analysis, e i testi vengono considerati con riferimento ai contesti storici e sociopolitici.

Tabloiding the truth: it's the pun wot won it

Steve Buckledee
2020-01-01

Abstract

This volume presents a thematic rather than chronological study of the UK tabloid newspapers from the 1960s to the present day. The focus is on the use of language but the prose style is that of “popular linguistics”, accessible to a general readership as well to academics and university students. The analytical tools are those of Stylistics and Critical Discourse Analysis and texts are always considered with refence to historical and sociopolitical context. Although some unsigned editorials are analysed, the preference is for signed articles written by journalists or commentators whose career details, political allegiances and past controversies can be readily discovered. For pieces written since the digital revolution, readers’ online feedback is also considered. Such readers hide their identities behind a nickname and therefore are not constrained by the need to respect legislation regarding defamation and race relations; often they make explicit claims or accusations that professional journalists can only allude to. If certain highly offensive posts are published verbatim, it may say something about the newspaper concerned.
2020
9783030472757
9783030472764
Questo volume presenta uno studio tematico ma non cronologico dei giornali popolari britannici (i “tabloid”) dagli anni ’60 del secolo scorso a tutt’oggi. Si focalizza sull’uso del linguaggio ma la prosa del volume è quella della “linguistica popolare”, accessibile non solo agli studiosi ma anche ai lettori non specializzati. Gli strumenti analitici adottati sono quelli della stilistica e della critical discourse analysis, e i testi vengono considerati con riferimento ai contesti storici e sociopolitici.
Tabloids; Metaphor; Implicature; Political bias
Giornali popolari; Metafora; Implicatura; Pregiudizi politici
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020_Bookmatter_TabloidingTheTruth.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Frontespizio, altri preliminari e indice
Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 150.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
150.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/294053
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact