My paper is an analysis of Marcel Griaule’s prologue to Dieu d'eau, his famous and classic ethnography of the Dogon. His paratext is an important and concentrated case to investigate the process through which an author conceives his work. By a cognitive linguistic approach, my study tries to examine, more particularly, some mechanisms through which Griaule provides a specific narration to his work. Interestingly, in his prologue it is possible to analyze some relationships concerning linguistic principles, some textual narratives and several concepts generally used in the book. His prologue is thus essential to read an ethnography in a double way: as a text containing some concepts associate with the Dogon and as a “narrative thinking” of these concepts. As a consequence, the central question in my paper is: how and how much do narrative choices produce a scientific text aspiring to be a representation of a different culture? Griaule’s discourse is obviously connected with cultural issues but what is also relevant here, from the narrative point of view, is Griaule’s way to represent himself in the text and the features associated with a certain idea of Africa. My purpose is indeed to focus on these joint narratives and cultural relationships.

Identité, narration, représentation et métaphores : la préface de Dieu d’eau de Griaule

Albano M
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020-01-01

Abstract

My paper is an analysis of Marcel Griaule’s prologue to Dieu d'eau, his famous and classic ethnography of the Dogon. His paratext is an important and concentrated case to investigate the process through which an author conceives his work. By a cognitive linguistic approach, my study tries to examine, more particularly, some mechanisms through which Griaule provides a specific narration to his work. Interestingly, in his prologue it is possible to analyze some relationships concerning linguistic principles, some textual narratives and several concepts generally used in the book. His prologue is thus essential to read an ethnography in a double way: as a text containing some concepts associate with the Dogon and as a “narrative thinking” of these concepts. As a consequence, the central question in my paper is: how and how much do narrative choices produce a scientific text aspiring to be a representation of a different culture? Griaule’s discourse is obviously connected with cultural issues but what is also relevant here, from the narrative point of view, is Griaule’s way to represent himself in the text and the features associated with a certain idea of Africa. My purpose is indeed to focus on these joint narratives and cultural relationships.
2020
978-2-90491-195-8
Cette étude analyse d’un point de vue sémio-linguistique les éléments qui participent à la construction de la préface du texte Dieu d’eau de Griaule . Nous nous proposons de souligner l’importance d’une telle approche pour l’étude de la préface en tenant compte des enquêtes menées par la linguistique cognitive et par la typologie fonctionnelle de Genette. Cette recherche a pour but d’apporter une contribution à l’analyse des préfaces, en montrant comment et dans quelle mesure le choix narratif produit un texte scientifique aspirant à la représentation d’une autre culture. De plus, nous essayons de dégager les concepts que l’auteur associe à la culture « autre » à travers une pensée narrative.
Preface; Discourse analysis; Metaphors
Préface; Analyse du discours; Métaphores
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Articolo Albano M. 2020.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/339273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact