This chapter addresses contradictions in the handling of claims of conscientious objection to abortion in Sweden and Italy, arguing that both phenomena may be examples of an uncovering of "hidden rules of behavior" underlying the fabric of these two democracies, and in direct contradiction with their public declarations and conceptions. Theoretical approaches, including "intercultural translation," will be elucidated as a means of exploring possible solutions for current struggles within legal pluralism, secularism and freedom, and in defense of human rights.
Conscientious objection in Swedish and Italian healthcare. Paradoxical secularizations and unbalanced pluralisms
Vazquez Cintron, Melisa LianaWriting – Original Draft Preparation
2018-01-01
Abstract
This chapter addresses contradictions in the handling of claims of conscientious objection to abortion in Sweden and Italy, arguing that both phenomena may be examples of an uncovering of "hidden rules of behavior" underlying the fabric of these two democracies, and in direct contradiction with their public declarations and conceptions. Theoretical approaches, including "intercultural translation," will be elucidated as a means of exploring possible solutions for current struggles within legal pluralism, secularism and freedom, and in defense of human rights.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vazquez_Conscientious_2018.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Dimensione
123.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
123.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNICA sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono protetti da diritto d'autore, salvo diversa indicazione.
