The Mixture of Experts (ME) model is one of the most popular ensemble methods used in pattern recognition and machine learning. Despite many studies on the theory and application of the ME model, to our knowledge, its training, testing, and evaluation costs have not been investigated yet. After analyzing the ME model in terms of number of required floating point operations, this paper makes an experimental comparison between the ME model and the recently proposed Mixture of Random Prototype Experts. Experiments have been performed on selected datasets from the UCI machine learning repository. Experimental results confirm the expected behavior of the two ME models, while highlighting that the latter performs better in terms of accuracy and run-time performance.

Run-Time Performance Analysis of the Mixture of Experts Model

ARMANO, GIULIANO;
2011-01-01

Abstract

The Mixture of Experts (ME) model is one of the most popular ensemble methods used in pattern recognition and machine learning. Despite many studies on the theory and application of the ME model, to our knowledge, its training, testing, and evaluation costs have not been investigated yet. After analyzing the ME model in terms of number of required floating point operations, this paper makes an experimental comparison between the ME model and the recently proposed Mixture of Random Prototype Experts. Experiments have been performed on selected datasets from the UCI machine learning repository. Experimental results confirm the expected behavior of the two ME models, while highlighting that the latter performs better in terms of accuracy and run-time performance.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/47370
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact