Problem statement: Cities, with more than 75% of consumption and 85% of global CO2 emissions, are the main leak of our country. The continuous process of urbanization highlights the human <need of city> and denounces the need to transform the urban settlement from a weak to a strenght of the future sustainability. Approach: Urban form and functions are deeply related to the availability of the energy resources in the territory, comparing the behavior of the city to a living organism, dependent on the energy flows into and out. This one-to-one relationship between form and energy sources, historically proved, emphasize mutations engender each other on their develop and their decline. Results: According to scientific studies, relevant “phisical” factors, such as morphology and density, directly affect settlement’s energy behavior and its microclimate. The uniqueness of each city and their ability to work simultaneously on local and global objectives, has driven Europe to indicate cities as a crux and urban design as the appropriate tool for defining the shape and land uses compatible with sustainability goals. Conclusion: Because of historical tie linking urban form and energy sources, the force switchover to renewable raises the question what will be the future shape of sustainabile city. The use of urban design as a tool to influence urban form becomes essential prerogative to bear on urban form and reach the optimal condition of energy’s island self-sustainable.
THE ROLE OF THE CITY’S SHAPE IN URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
CHIRI, GIOVANNI MARCO;GIOVAGNORIO, ILARIA
2012-01-01
Abstract
Problem statement: Cities, with more than 75% of consumption and 85% of global CO2 emissions, are the main leak of our country. The continuous process of urbanization highlights the human <need of city> and denounces the need to transform the urban settlement from a weak to a strenght of the future sustainability. Approach: Urban form and functions are deeply related to the availability of the energy resources in the territory, comparing the behavior of the city to a living organism, dependent on the energy flows into and out. This one-to-one relationship between form and energy sources, historically proved, emphasize mutations engender each other on their develop and their decline. Results: According to scientific studies, relevant “phisical” factors, such as morphology and density, directly affect settlement’s energy behavior and its microclimate. The uniqueness of each city and their ability to work simultaneously on local and global objectives, has driven Europe to indicate cities as a crux and urban design as the appropriate tool for defining the shape and land uses compatible with sustainability goals. Conclusion: Because of historical tie linking urban form and energy sources, the force switchover to renewable raises the question what will be the future shape of sustainabile city. The use of urban design as a tool to influence urban form becomes essential prerogative to bear on urban form and reach the optimal condition of energy’s island self-sustainable.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
