Recent technological improvements have driven the rapid increase in natural gas production from unconventional reservoirs. The heaviest hydrocarbon fraction of this fossil fuel, the so-called natural gas liquids (NGL), have greater economic interest justifying the attention on its separation process from the raw gas. Various process schemes have been developed and studied for the NGL recovery, including the conventional, cold residue recycle (CRR), and the gas subcooled process (GSP). This study aims to assess different control strategies for a GSP unit and determine the most appropriate and effective process control scheme. For this, the dynamic responses for each control scheme are evaluated by changing feed flow rate and composition. The main targets are the achievement of 84% ethane recovery and low levels of methane impurity at the bottom of the demethanizer column. Due to the high cost of composition analyzers and the high delays introduced by composition controllers under the presence of flow disturbances, the control goals are reached by the knowledge of on-line temperature measurements. This is done by considering different temperature control structures such as the direct temperature control and cascade control, plus a pressure compensator. The results are compared, in presence of composition disturbances, with the action of a hybrid cascade control that uses in-line delayed concentration measurements to update the controller reference at each sampling period. Here, the hybrid and the simple cascade controls show the best control performance.

Control of a natural gas liquid recovery plant in a GSP unit under feed and composition disturbances

Mandis M.
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Tronci S.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Baratti R.
Penultimo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Recent technological improvements have driven the rapid increase in natural gas production from unconventional reservoirs. The heaviest hydrocarbon fraction of this fossil fuel, the so-called natural gas liquids (NGL), have greater economic interest justifying the attention on its separation process from the raw gas. Various process schemes have been developed and studied for the NGL recovery, including the conventional, cold residue recycle (CRR), and the gas subcooled process (GSP). This study aims to assess different control strategies for a GSP unit and determine the most appropriate and effective process control scheme. For this, the dynamic responses for each control scheme are evaluated by changing feed flow rate and composition. The main targets are the achievement of 84% ethane recovery and low levels of methane impurity at the bottom of the demethanizer column. Due to the high cost of composition analyzers and the high delays introduced by composition controllers under the presence of flow disturbances, the control goals are reached by the knowledge of on-line temperature measurements. This is done by considering different temperature control structures such as the direct temperature control and cascade control, plus a pressure compensator. The results are compared, in presence of composition disturbances, with the action of a hybrid cascade control that uses in-line delayed concentration measurements to update the controller reference at each sampling period. Here, the hybrid and the simple cascade controls show the best control performance.
2021
Discrete composition control
Dynamic process simulation
Hybrid cascade control
Natural gas liquids recovery
Pressure compensated temperature
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IFACv54i3p182.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principlae
Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 838.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
838.11 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/320849
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact