Mobile sensor-based activity recognition is a growing research field with important applications areas, such as healthcare and well-being. Data collected from multiple sensors, including smartphone sensors that are now ubiquitous, can be exploited to build predictive models capable of recognizing actions and activities performed by humans in their daily life. This involves several processing steps, from the cleansing of raw data to the extraction of suitable features and the induction of proper classifiers. Dimensionality reduction techniques may also be important for the efficiency and the exploitability of the induced models, especially when dealing with multi-sensor data leading to high-dimensional feature vectors. In such a scenario, feature selection algorithms can be very useful to identify and retain only the most informative and predictive features. However, little research has so far investigated which selection approaches may be most appropriate in sensor-based activity recognition tasks. To give a contribution in this direction, our paper compares the performance of different feature selection methods, both univariate and multivariate, on a public domain benchmark containing smartphone sensor data. We performed a comprehensive evaluation considering the extent to which each method effectively identifies the most predictive features and the overall stability of the selection process, i.e., its robustness to changes in the input data. Our results give interesting insight on which methods may be most suited in this domain, showing that it is possible to significantly reduce the data dimensionality without compromising the activity recognition performance.

Feature Selection in Mobile Activity Recognition: A Comparative Study

Loddo A.;Pes B.
;
Riboni D.
2021-01-01

Abstract

Mobile sensor-based activity recognition is a growing research field with important applications areas, such as healthcare and well-being. Data collected from multiple sensors, including smartphone sensors that are now ubiquitous, can be exploited to build predictive models capable of recognizing actions and activities performed by humans in their daily life. This involves several processing steps, from the cleansing of raw data to the extraction of suitable features and the induction of proper classifiers. Dimensionality reduction techniques may also be important for the efficiency and the exploitability of the induced models, especially when dealing with multi-sensor data leading to high-dimensional feature vectors. In such a scenario, feature selection algorithms can be very useful to identify and retain only the most informative and predictive features. However, little research has so far investigated which selection approaches may be most appropriate in sensor-based activity recognition tasks. To give a contribution in this direction, our paper compares the performance of different feature selection methods, both univariate and multivariate, on a public domain benchmark containing smartphone sensor data. We performed a comprehensive evaluation considering the extent to which each method effectively identifies the most predictive features and the overall stability of the selection process, i.e., its robustness to changes in the input data. Our results give interesting insight on which methods may be most suited in this domain, showing that it is possible to significantly reduce the data dimensionality without compromising the activity recognition performance.
2021
978-1-6654-2845-3
Feature selection; Human activity recognition; Machine learning; Mobile sensor data
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MDM2021_final.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione 342.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
342.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/323230
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact