In this paper we compare the results of different methodologies of inspections, made on the deck of a concrete bridge located near Cagliari, along the SS 195 road to Capoterra. From a strategic point of view this structure plays a key role ensuring direct connections from Cagliari to different structures related to industrial and local productions and to an important touristic district. Aim of our work is to obtain a real measure of the vulnerability through two procedures and compare them. The first one is based only on visual inspection while the second one realizes a measure in time of the vulnerability through chemical and physical processes focusing on the carbonation depth. With the first procedure we manipulated the data obtained by visual inspection with fuzzy logic, thus using mathematical and logic functions to transform linguistic assessments, inherently subjective, into a numerical result, thus objective, representing the failure probability. This is derived from visual inspection and it’s then compared to the results obtained through the evaluation of the carbonation process in the concrete beams of the bridge. The goal is to verify the reliability of visual inspection through the comparison of the data obtained with the two different approaches and trace a methodology in order to reduce the number of invasive actions and their cost.
Vulnerabilty assessment of a concrete bridge through fuzzy logic analysis of visual inspection compared to chemical inspection
PIRAS, MARIA VALERIA;MISTRETTA, FAUSTO;DEIAS, LUISA
2010-01-01
Abstract
In this paper we compare the results of different methodologies of inspections, made on the deck of a concrete bridge located near Cagliari, along the SS 195 road to Capoterra. From a strategic point of view this structure plays a key role ensuring direct connections from Cagliari to different structures related to industrial and local productions and to an important touristic district. Aim of our work is to obtain a real measure of the vulnerability through two procedures and compare them. The first one is based only on visual inspection while the second one realizes a measure in time of the vulnerability through chemical and physical processes focusing on the carbonation depth. With the first procedure we manipulated the data obtained by visual inspection with fuzzy logic, thus using mathematical and logic functions to transform linguistic assessments, inherently subjective, into a numerical result, thus objective, representing the failure probability. This is derived from visual inspection and it’s then compared to the results obtained through the evaluation of the carbonation process in the concrete beams of the bridge. The goal is to verify the reliability of visual inspection through the comparison of the data obtained with the two different approaches and trace a methodology in order to reduce the number of invasive actions and their cost.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
