Cephalometric analysis plays an important role in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment; over the past half-century, increasingly comprehensive and accurate cephalometric systems have been developed. Overreliance on cephalometric data, however, can be problematic if different systems yield different diagnostic results. The present study compared the Steiner, Ricketts, and Cervera analyses, which are based on different reference planes, in the skeletal diagnosis of 35 patients with class II maloclusion
Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses / L. CONTARDO; M. CESCHI; A. CASTALDO; DENOTTI G; R. DI LENARDA. - 42(2008), pp. 389-392.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Titolo: | Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses |
Autori: | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2008 |
Rivista: | |
Citazione: | Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses / L. CONTARDO; M. CESCHI; A. CASTALDO; DENOTTI G; R. DI LENARDA. - 42(2008), pp. 389-392. |
Abstract: | Cephalometric analysis plays an important role in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment; over the past half-century, increasingly comprehensive and accurate cephalometric systems have been developed. Overreliance on cephalometric data, however, can be problematic if different systems yield different diagnostic results. The present study compared the Steiner, Ricketts, and Cervera analyses, which are based on different reference planes, in the skeletal diagnosis of 35 patients with class II maloclusion |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11584/22212 |
Tipologia: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |