Background: 4,4′-DMAR (4,4′-dimethylaminorex; “Serotoni”) is a potent stimulant drug that has recently been associated with a number of fatalities in Europe. Over the last few years, online communities have emerged as important resources for disseminating levels of technical knowledge on novel psychoactive substances. Objective: Analysing the information provided by the fora communities on 4,4′-DMAR use, additionally critical reviewing the available evidence-based literature on this topic. Methods: Different website drug fora were identified. A critical review of the existing evidence-based literature was undertaken. Individuation and analysis of qualitative data from the identified website fora were performed. Results: The combined search results identified six website fora from which a range of qualitative data on recurring themes was collected. These themes included routes of administration and doses; desired effects; adverse effects; comparison with other drugs; association with other drugs; medications self-administered to reverse 4,4′-DMAR action; overall impression; and provision of harm-reduction advice. Conclusions: Although being characterized by a number of methodological limitations, the social networks' Web monitoring approach (netnography) may be helpful to better understand some of the clinical and psychopharmacological issues pertaining to a range of novel psychoactive substances, including 4,4′-DMAR, for which only extremely little, if any, scientific knowledge is available.

4,4′-Dimethylaminorex (“4,4′-DMAR”; “Serotoni”) misuse: A Web-based study

De Luca, Maria Antonietta
Investigation
;
Pintori, Nicholas
Investigation
;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background: 4,4′-DMAR (4,4′-dimethylaminorex; “Serotoni”) is a potent stimulant drug that has recently been associated with a number of fatalities in Europe. Over the last few years, online communities have emerged as important resources for disseminating levels of technical knowledge on novel psychoactive substances. Objective: Analysing the information provided by the fora communities on 4,4′-DMAR use, additionally critical reviewing the available evidence-based literature on this topic. Methods: Different website drug fora were identified. A critical review of the existing evidence-based literature was undertaken. Individuation and analysis of qualitative data from the identified website fora were performed. Results: The combined search results identified six website fora from which a range of qualitative data on recurring themes was collected. These themes included routes of administration and doses; desired effects; adverse effects; comparison with other drugs; association with other drugs; medications self-administered to reverse 4,4′-DMAR action; overall impression; and provision of harm-reduction advice. Conclusions: Although being characterized by a number of methodological limitations, the social networks' Web monitoring approach (netnography) may be helpful to better understand some of the clinical and psychopharmacological issues pertaining to a range of novel psychoactive substances, including 4,4′-DMAR, for which only extremely little, if any, scientific knowledge is available.
2017
4,4′-DMAR; aminorex derivatives; novel psychoactive substances; online fora; psychonauts; stimulants;
4,4′-DMAR; Aminorex derivatives; Novel psychoactive substances; Online fora; Psychonauts; Stimulants; Neurology; Neurology (clinical); Psychiatry and mental health; Pharmacology (medical)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Loi_et_al-2017-Human_Psychopharmacology__Clinical_and_Experimental.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 728.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
728.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/238200
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact