Introduction: It has been proposed that sailing can improve quality of life, personal and social skills of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a psychosocial rehabilitative intervention focused on sailing on quality of life, self-efficacy and sense of coherence in people with severe psychosocial disabilities. Methods: The study was a randomized, with parallel groups, waiting-list controlled trial. Participants were 51 people with severe psychosocial disabilities. The intervention was a structured course to learn sailing in a crew lasting three months. A randomized group began the sailing course immediately after a pre-treatment assessment; the waitlist group began the sailing course after a three months period of treatments as usual. Participants were assessed before and after the sailing course, or the waiting list period, on the General Self- Efficacy scale (GSES), Sense Of Coherence scale (SOC) and Health Survey-short form (SF-12). Results: Self-efficacy significantly increased after the sailing course and decreased after treatment as usual (p=0.015). Sense of coherence and the levels of quality of life tended to improve after the sailing course, albeit below levels of statistical significance. Conclusion: When compared to more traditional psychosocial rehabilitative activities, an intervention focused on sailing in a crew positively impacts the sense of coherence and the levels of quality of life and significantly improves self-efficacy of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. Further longitudinal research is required.

"VelaMente?!" - Sailing in a crew to improve self-efficacy in people with psychosocial disabilities: A randomized controlled trial

Sancassiani F
;
Cossu G.;Trincas G.;Mellino G.;Carta M. G.
2017-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: It has been proposed that sailing can improve quality of life, personal and social skills of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a psychosocial rehabilitative intervention focused on sailing on quality of life, self-efficacy and sense of coherence in people with severe psychosocial disabilities. Methods: The study was a randomized, with parallel groups, waiting-list controlled trial. Participants were 51 people with severe psychosocial disabilities. The intervention was a structured course to learn sailing in a crew lasting three months. A randomized group began the sailing course immediately after a pre-treatment assessment; the waitlist group began the sailing course after a three months period of treatments as usual. Participants were assessed before and after the sailing course, or the waiting list period, on the General Self- Efficacy scale (GSES), Sense Of Coherence scale (SOC) and Health Survey-short form (SF-12). Results: Self-efficacy significantly increased after the sailing course and decreased after treatment as usual (p=0.015). Sense of coherence and the levels of quality of life tended to improve after the sailing course, albeit below levels of statistical significance. Conclusion: When compared to more traditional psychosocial rehabilitative activities, an intervention focused on sailing in a crew positively impacts the sense of coherence and the levels of quality of life and significantly improves self-efficacy of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. Further longitudinal research is required.
2017
Psychosocial rehabilitation; Quality of life; Sailing; Self-efficacy; Sense of coherence; Sport;
sailing; sport; psychosocial rehabilitation; quality of life; self-efficacy; sense of coherence.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CPEMH-13-200.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 493.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
493.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/238431
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact