Background: Before derivatization, urine analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) requires the complete removal of urea to avoid interferences. We aimed at establishing the most effective sample pretreatment for urea removing; moreover, we explored the impact of two short-term sample storage conditions on urine metabolome. Methods: 92 aliquots were obtained from a single sample collected from a healthy adult; they were divided into 6 groups. Group 1 consisted of untreated aliquots while groups 2–6 differed from each other for the addition of various defined urease solution volumes combined with either 30min or 1-hour sonication time. Urine sample storage was tested by comparing 20 fresh aliquots analyzed after collection with 20 aliquots frozen at −80°C for 72h. Results: the most effective protocol consisted of the combination between 200μL urease solution with 1-h sonication time; urease solution volumes >200μL increase the risk to underestimate metabolite peaks because of sample dilution. Short-term storage of samples at −80°C pointed out significant changes in the urine metabolic profile compared with that of fresh samples. Conclusions: our study confirms the importance of urea removal for a reliable recognition and quantitation of metabolites; urine short-term storage at −80°C should be carefully reconsidered.

Urine metabolome analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS): Standardization and optimization of protocols for urea removal and short-term sample storage

Claudia Fattuoni
Ultimo
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Before derivatization, urine analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) requires the complete removal of urea to avoid interferences. We aimed at establishing the most effective sample pretreatment for urea removing; moreover, we explored the impact of two short-term sample storage conditions on urine metabolome. Methods: 92 aliquots were obtained from a single sample collected from a healthy adult; they were divided into 6 groups. Group 1 consisted of untreated aliquots while groups 2–6 differed from each other for the addition of various defined urease solution volumes combined with either 30min or 1-hour sonication time. Urine sample storage was tested by comparing 20 fresh aliquots analyzed after collection with 20 aliquots frozen at −80°C for 72h. Results: the most effective protocol consisted of the combination between 200μL urease solution with 1-h sonication time; urease solution volumes >200μL increase the risk to underestimate metabolite peaks because of sample dilution. Short-term storage of samples at −80°C pointed out significant changes in the urine metabolic profile compared with that of fresh samples. Conclusions: our study confirms the importance of urea removal for a reliable recognition and quantitation of metabolites; urine short-term storage at −80°C should be carefully reconsidered.
2018
Metabolomics; Urea removal; Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS); Urease; Urine sample storage protocols; Pre-analytical phase
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Proofs CCA_15292.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione pre-print
Dimensione 833.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
833.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/249176
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact