Studies have shown that metaphors influence the understanding of a lexical ambiguity fallacy (Ervaset al. 2015 018). However, a systematic research on the effects of metaphors in argument production is still missing. The paper presents the results of an experiment where participants completed lexical ambiguous arguments, selecting either a metaphor or a literal word as the middle term. It shows that metaphor conventionality and plausibility of argument conclusion influence both argument production and understanding differently.
Metaphor in argument production vs. understanding
Ervas, F
;Ojha, A.
2019-01-01
Abstract
Studies have shown that metaphors influence the understanding of a lexical ambiguity fallacy (Ervaset al. 2015 018). However, a systematic research on the effects of metaphors in argument production is still missing. The paper presents the results of an experiment where participants completed lexical ambiguous arguments, selecting either a metaphor or a literal word as the middle term. It shows that metaphor conventionality and plausibility of argument conclusion influence both argument production and understanding differently.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ISSA_2018_Ervas_Ojha.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
473.2 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
473.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.