Studies have shown that metaphors influence the understanding of a lexical ambiguity fallacy (Ervaset al. 2015 018). However, a systematic research on the effects of metaphors in argument production is still missing. The paper presents the results of an experiment where participants completed lexical ambiguous arguments, selecting either a metaphor or a literal word as the middle term. It shows that metaphor conventionality and plausibility of argument conclusion influence both argument production and understanding differently.

Metaphor in argument production vs. understanding

Ervas, F
;
Ojha, A.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Studies have shown that metaphors influence the understanding of a lexical ambiguity fallacy (Ervaset al. 2015 018). However, a systematic research on the effects of metaphors in argument production is still missing. The paper presents the results of an experiment where participants completed lexical ambiguous arguments, selecting either a metaphor or a literal word as the middle term. It shows that metaphor conventionality and plausibility of argument conclusion influence both argument production and understanding differently.
2019
9789090316369
Argument processing; Argument production; Argument understanding; Belief in the conclusion; Metaphor; Fallacy of equivocation; Psychology of argumentation; Quaternio terminorum
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ISSA_2018_Ervas_Ojha.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 473.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
473.2 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/263536
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact