According to the recent EU Directives on building energy efficiency, the Italian government is paying particular attention to energy refurbishments of buildings by enacting energy measures and obtaining significant results. In particular, the Italian government is providing economic incentives to citizens or public administrations that improve the envelope of the energy performance of a building. However, according to strict national regulations concerning building heritage, most actions cannot be applied to historic buildings, even though they represent approximately 30.1% of all buildings. In this context, the energy retrofits for Italian buildings are not simple but necessary. Therefore, in this work, a public historic building was simulated, and some permitted retrofit actions were applied to analyse the effectiveness of national measures in four different climatic zones. The results showed that the same applied action that reduces the primary energy consumption in some zones will significantly increase consumption in other zones, even if the zones fall within the same case-law. Finally, the results highlight two main unsolved issues: the renewable energy source installation of a historic building and a strong distinction between measures and economic incentives around the Italian peninsula, which has very different climate conditions.

Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian public historic buildings

A. Galatioto
Primo
;
R. Ricciu
Secondo
;
2019-01-01

Abstract

According to the recent EU Directives on building energy efficiency, the Italian government is paying particular attention to energy refurbishments of buildings by enacting energy measures and obtaining significant results. In particular, the Italian government is providing economic incentives to citizens or public administrations that improve the envelope of the energy performance of a building. However, according to strict national regulations concerning building heritage, most actions cannot be applied to historic buildings, even though they represent approximately 30.1% of all buildings. In this context, the energy retrofits for Italian buildings are not simple but necessary. Therefore, in this work, a public historic building was simulated, and some permitted retrofit actions were applied to analyse the effectiveness of national measures in four different climatic zones. The results showed that the same applied action that reduces the primary energy consumption in some zones will significantly increase consumption in other zones, even if the zones fall within the same case-law. Finally, the results highlight two main unsolved issues: the renewable energy source installation of a historic building and a strong distinction between measures and economic incentives around the Italian peninsula, which has very different climate conditions.
2019
energy retrofit; historic building; energy policy; payback time; economic feasibility
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
energy historic public building_2019.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo online
Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 680.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
680.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
RICCIU - Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian publichistoric buildings R02 - PREPRINT.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: File pre print con DOI
Tipologia: versione pre-print
Dimensione 753.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
753.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
RICCIU - Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian publichistoric buildings R02 - POSTPRINT.pdf

Open Access dal 01/01/2022

Descrizione: Versione post print dopo 2 anni di embargo
Tipologia: versione post-print
Dimensione 754.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
754.25 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/263712
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact