Introduction: Sensory trick is a specific maneuver that temporarily improves dystonia that is usually observed in 44%–89% of patients with cranial-cervical dystonia and in 20% of patients with upper limb dystonia. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of sensory trick in a cohort of 37 patients with idiopathic adult-onset upper limb dystonia and to determine whether sensory trick can be a useful tool to distinguish dystonic and non-dystonic tremor. Methods: Thirty-seven right-handed patients with idiopathic upper limb dystonia and disturbed handwriting and 19 patients with non-dystonic action tremor in the upper limb causing writing disturbances participated into the study. Patients were asked to write a standard sentence twice, before and after applying a standardized sensory trick (gently grabbing right wrist with his left hand). Readability of the two sentences was assessed by three observers blinded to diagnosis. Results: Five/37 patients (13%) self-discovered ST over disease history, while performing the standardized trick maneuver improved handwriting in 14/37 patients (38%). Interobserver agreement on the effectiveness of sensory trick among the three observers yielded a kappa value of 0.86 (p < 0.0001). The standardized trick was effective in 8/19 patients with dystonic tremor (42%) and in 0/19 patients with non-dystonic tremor (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The results of applying a standardized non-spontaneous trick demonstrated that, in upper limb dystonia, ST may be more frequent than usually observed. Effective sensory trick, when present, may be a hallmark of idiopathic dystonia. The lack of effective sensory trick may help to identify non dystonic upper limb tremor.

Sensory trick in upper limb dystonia

Dagostino, Sabino;Ercoli, Tommaso;Fadda, Laura;Defazio, Giovanni
Ultimo
2019-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Sensory trick is a specific maneuver that temporarily improves dystonia that is usually observed in 44%–89% of patients with cranial-cervical dystonia and in 20% of patients with upper limb dystonia. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of sensory trick in a cohort of 37 patients with idiopathic adult-onset upper limb dystonia and to determine whether sensory trick can be a useful tool to distinguish dystonic and non-dystonic tremor. Methods: Thirty-seven right-handed patients with idiopathic upper limb dystonia and disturbed handwriting and 19 patients with non-dystonic action tremor in the upper limb causing writing disturbances participated into the study. Patients were asked to write a standard sentence twice, before and after applying a standardized sensory trick (gently grabbing right wrist with his left hand). Readability of the two sentences was assessed by three observers blinded to diagnosis. Results: Five/37 patients (13%) self-discovered ST over disease history, while performing the standardized trick maneuver improved handwriting in 14/37 patients (38%). Interobserver agreement on the effectiveness of sensory trick among the three observers yielded a kappa value of 0.86 (p < 0.0001). The standardized trick was effective in 8/19 patients with dystonic tremor (42%) and in 0/19 patients with non-dystonic tremor (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The results of applying a standardized non-spontaneous trick demonstrated that, in upper limb dystonia, ST may be more frequent than usually observed. Effective sensory trick, when present, may be a hallmark of idiopathic dystonia. The lack of effective sensory trick may help to identify non dystonic upper limb tremor.
2019
Dystonia; Handwriting; Sensory trick; Tremor; Neurology; Geriatrics and Gerontology; Neurology (clinical)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019PRDDagostino.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 345.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
345.93 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/263746
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact