Background. The first human face allograft was performed in France on November 27, 2005. We report herein the clinicopathologic findings from the skin and oral mucosa of this allograft during the first eight months. Methods. Sequential biopsies were taken from the facial skin (n3), oral mucosa (n20), and sentinel skin graft (n11) from day 3 to day 220 postgraft and examined (immuno)histologically, using a pathological score previously proposed for evaluation of rejection in composite tissue (hand) transplantation. Results. The patient developed clinically rejection episodes at day 20 and during the eighth month postgraft, manifest- ing with redness and edema of the facial skin, oral mucosa, and sentinel graft skin. Pathologically, changes suggestive of rejection grades 0, I, II, and III were seen in 1, 1, 1, and 0 biopsies of facial skin, 7, 2, 1, and 1 biopsies of sentinel skin graft and 3, 5, 8, and 4 biopsies of oral mucosa, respectively. Pathological changes were generally more severe in the oral mucosa than in facial and sentinel graft skin (mean scores 1.85, 0.64, and 1, respectively). Conclusions. As it happens with other composite tissue allografts, close clinicopathologic monitoring of the skin (and oral mucosa) seems to be the most reliable way to detect rejection in the setting of human facial tissue allotransplan- tation. Apart from these rejection episodes, the skin and mucosa maintained a normal microscopic structure, parallel- ing functional recovery.
Clinicopathologic monitoring of the skin and oral mucosa of the first human face allograft: Report on the first eight months
PETRUZZO, PALMINA;
2006-01-01
Abstract
Background. The first human face allograft was performed in France on November 27, 2005. We report herein the clinicopathologic findings from the skin and oral mucosa of this allograft during the first eight months. Methods. Sequential biopsies were taken from the facial skin (n3), oral mucosa (n20), and sentinel skin graft (n11) from day 3 to day 220 postgraft and examined (immuno)histologically, using a pathological score previously proposed for evaluation of rejection in composite tissue (hand) transplantation. Results. The patient developed clinically rejection episodes at day 20 and during the eighth month postgraft, manifest- ing with redness and edema of the facial skin, oral mucosa, and sentinel graft skin. Pathologically, changes suggestive of rejection grades 0, I, II, and III were seen in 1, 1, 1, and 0 biopsies of facial skin, 7, 2, 1, and 1 biopsies of sentinel skin graft and 3, 5, 8, and 4 biopsies of oral mucosa, respectively. Pathological changes were generally more severe in the oral mucosa than in facial and sentinel graft skin (mean scores 1.85, 0.64, and 1, respectively). Conclusions. As it happens with other composite tissue allografts, close clinicopathologic monitoring of the skin (and oral mucosa) seems to be the most reliable way to detect rejection in the setting of human facial tissue allotransplan- tation. Apart from these rejection episodes, the skin and mucosa maintained a normal microscopic structure, parallel- ing functional recovery.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
