Objectives The aim of this article was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) Core measure, the new adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Study Design and Setting For our diagnostic study, we recruited cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments from six European countries. Patients completed the EORTC CAT Core and a questionnaire with anchor items assessing criteria for clinical importance (limitations in everyday life, need for help/care, and worries by the patient/family/partner) for each EORTC CAT Core domain. We used a binary variable summarizing the anchor items for determining TCIs and for calculating the area under the curve (AUC) in receiving operator characteristic analysis as a measure of diagnostic accuracy. Results Using data from 498 cancer patients (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women), we established TCIs for the 14 domains of the EORTC CAT Core. Median AUC across domains was 0.93 (range 0.84–0.94). Median sensitivity and specificity of the TCIs were 0.91 (range 0.80–0.96) and 0.77 (range 0.66–0.84), respectively. TCIs and AUCs were largely consistent across patient groups. Conclusion We have generated TCIs for the 14 functional health and symptom domains of the EORTC CAT Core. The EORTC CAT Core showed high diagnostic accuracy in identifying clinically important symptoms and functional impairments.

Thresholds for clinical importance were defined for the EORTC CAT Core - an adaptive measure of core quality of life domains in oncology clinical practice and research

Caocci, Giovanni;EFFICACE, FABIO;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this article was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) Core measure, the new adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Study Design and Setting For our diagnostic study, we recruited cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments from six European countries. Patients completed the EORTC CAT Core and a questionnaire with anchor items assessing criteria for clinical importance (limitations in everyday life, need for help/care, and worries by the patient/family/partner) for each EORTC CAT Core domain. We used a binary variable summarizing the anchor items for determining TCIs and for calculating the area under the curve (AUC) in receiving operator characteristic analysis as a measure of diagnostic accuracy. Results Using data from 498 cancer patients (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women), we established TCIs for the 14 domains of the EORTC CAT Core. Median AUC across domains was 0.93 (range 0.84–0.94). Median sensitivity and specificity of the TCIs were 0.91 (range 0.80–0.96) and 0.77 (range 0.66–0.84), respectively. TCIs and AUCs were largely consistent across patient groups. Conclusion We have generated TCIs for the 14 functional health and symptom domains of the EORTC CAT Core. The EORTC CAT Core showed high diagnostic accuracy in identifying clinically important symptoms and functional impairments.
2020
EORTC CAT Core; clinical oncology; clinical significance; cut-offs; patient-reported outcome measures; quality of life; thresholds
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Thresholds for clinical importance were defined for the EORTC CAT Core – an adaptive measure of core quality of life domains in oncology clinical practice and research.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione pre-print
Dimensione 848.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
848.83 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
PIIS0895435619306213.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 400.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
400.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/278161
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact