Purpose Two-dimensional (2D) strain derived from speckle tracking proved to be feasible and accurate in the quantitative evaluation of myocardial ischemia during stress echocardiography. We compared the accuracy in detecting myocardial ischemia of the transmural segmental analysis with an endocardial specific evaluation in 20 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and coronary angiography. Methods Peak systolic global strain (G-epsilon) and at the subendocardial level (Endo-epsilon) were measured off-line at rest, a low dose, and peak stress; then, we compared the results with wall-motion analysis and significant coronary artery disease (CAD > 70% diameter stenosis). Endocardial strain variation from basal to low and peak dose was computed both for global or subendocardial analysis. The utilization of the ROC curve allowed us to derive optimal cutoffs, sensibility and specificity for ischemic segments. Results The subendocardial analysis at high dose showed to be able to increase significantly the accuracy of the test to detect the ischemic segments (sens 90.2% vs 85.4%; spec 93.1% vs 92.2%). Moreover, at the low dose, the subendocardial analysis showed to be able to increase significantly, mostly the specificity of the test (sens 69.6% vs 68.3%; spec 92.2% vs 86.2%). Notably, the strain subendocardial analysis at low dose showed to reach a high specificity, similar to the peak dose transmural analysis. Conclusions Measurement of subendocardial strain during DSE is feasible and can increase the accuracy of the test. Moreover, the subendocardial strain during DSE can reach a high specificity, even limiting the test at a low dose infusion.

Early ischemia identification employing 2D speckle tracking selective layers analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Cadeddu Dessalvi C.;Deidda M.
;
Farci S.;Longu G.;Mercuro G.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Purpose Two-dimensional (2D) strain derived from speckle tracking proved to be feasible and accurate in the quantitative evaluation of myocardial ischemia during stress echocardiography. We compared the accuracy in detecting myocardial ischemia of the transmural segmental analysis with an endocardial specific evaluation in 20 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and coronary angiography. Methods Peak systolic global strain (G-epsilon) and at the subendocardial level (Endo-epsilon) were measured off-line at rest, a low dose, and peak stress; then, we compared the results with wall-motion analysis and significant coronary artery disease (CAD > 70% diameter stenosis). Endocardial strain variation from basal to low and peak dose was computed both for global or subendocardial analysis. The utilization of the ROC curve allowed us to derive optimal cutoffs, sensibility and specificity for ischemic segments. Results The subendocardial analysis at high dose showed to be able to increase significantly the accuracy of the test to detect the ischemic segments (sens 90.2% vs 85.4%; spec 93.1% vs 92.2%). Moreover, at the low dose, the subendocardial analysis showed to be able to increase significantly, mostly the specificity of the test (sens 69.6% vs 68.3%; spec 92.2% vs 86.2%). Notably, the strain subendocardial analysis at low dose showed to reach a high specificity, similar to the peak dose transmural analysis. Conclusions Measurement of subendocardial strain during DSE is feasible and can increase the accuracy of the test. Moreover, the subendocardial strain during DSE can reach a high specificity, even limiting the test at a low dose infusion.
2019
dobutamine stress echo; layer-specific strain; speckle tracking imaging; strain analysis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dessalvi_et_al-2019-Echocardiography.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione 910 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
910 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/281089
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact