The aim of the research is to demonstrate how a rescriptum from the age of Diocletian, incorporated in C. 4.50.6, represents a case in which the principle regarding the way in which all terms of an agreement are effective is applied. Since iusta causa traditionis, in an assumption infringed by the basic ambiguity in the statement of the claimant, may be considered valid and effective ab initio and, as a result, suitable to support the conveyance of property, thanks to a recovery mechanism that can be related – in view of our dogmatic categories – to conservative interpretation (i.e. all terms to be given effect) rather than to the conservation of a agreement that is null and void.
La ricerca propone un'esegesi di C. 4.50.6, con specifica incidenza sul § 6.3
Una problematica lettura dioclezianea in tema di principio di utilizzazione negoziale ed interpretazione conservativa della 'iusta causa traditionis'
FERCIA, R.
2019-01-01
Abstract
The aim of the research is to demonstrate how a rescriptum from the age of Diocletian, incorporated in C. 4.50.6, represents a case in which the principle regarding the way in which all terms of an agreement are effective is applied. Since iusta causa traditionis, in an assumption infringed by the basic ambiguity in the statement of the claimant, may be considered valid and effective ab initio and, as a result, suitable to support the conveyance of property, thanks to a recovery mechanism that can be related – in view of our dogmatic categories – to conservative interpretation (i.e. all terms to be given effect) rather than to the conservation of a agreement that is null and void.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
4 Fercia, in LR 8-2019.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
240.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
240.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
