Old age is associated with variability in gait motor output, particularly in females, and is linked to fall risk. However, little is known about how older age and sex affect variability in the outputs of individual joints, and how these variabilities contribute to the collective gait output. Healthy adults aged 18–99 years (N = 102, 57 females) completed six trials of straight walking at self-selected speed. Stride time variability (coefficient of variation) and variabilities of lower limb tridimensional joint angles (standard deviations: SD) were calculated. Age * Sex (A * S) mixed models were conducted on all measures and year-by-year rates of change were subsequently estimated. Correlations and stepwise linear regression analyses were computed between joint angular variabilities and stride time variability. Each year of age was associated with 0.022% higher stride time variability (A: p = .002), 0.07° lower variability in peak ankle dorsiflexion (A: p = .004), 0.002–0.098° higher variability in mean ankle inversion/eversion, mean pelvic obliquity, and pelvic rotation range of motion (A: p < .05), and 0.024° higher variability in knee flexion/extension range of motion in males (A * S: p = .003). Higher variability in mean ankle and hip flexion/extension and in mean ankle inversion/eversion correlated with (ρ = 0.211–0.336; ps < 0.05) and independently predicted higher stride time variability (ps < 0.05), together explaining 21.9% of variance. Results suggest that higher stride time variability with older age may be produced by a shift from sagittal plane variability to frontal plane variability at the ankle.

Does variability in motor output at individual joints predict stride time variability in gait? Influences of age, sex, and plane of motion

Porta, Micaela
Secondo
Formal Analysis
;
Pilloni, Giuseppina
Formal Analysis
;
Arippa, Federico
Formal Analysis
;
Pau, Massimiliano
Ultimo
Methodology
2020-01-01

Abstract

Old age is associated with variability in gait motor output, particularly in females, and is linked to fall risk. However, little is known about how older age and sex affect variability in the outputs of individual joints, and how these variabilities contribute to the collective gait output. Healthy adults aged 18–99 years (N = 102, 57 females) completed six trials of straight walking at self-selected speed. Stride time variability (coefficient of variation) and variabilities of lower limb tridimensional joint angles (standard deviations: SD) were calculated. Age * Sex (A * S) mixed models were conducted on all measures and year-by-year rates of change were subsequently estimated. Correlations and stepwise linear regression analyses were computed between joint angular variabilities and stride time variability. Each year of age was associated with 0.022% higher stride time variability (A: p = .002), 0.07° lower variability in peak ankle dorsiflexion (A: p = .004), 0.002–0.098° higher variability in mean ankle inversion/eversion, mean pelvic obliquity, and pelvic rotation range of motion (A: p < .05), and 0.024° higher variability in knee flexion/extension range of motion in males (A * S: p = .003). Higher variability in mean ankle and hip flexion/extension and in mean ankle inversion/eversion correlated with (ρ = 0.211–0.336; ps < 0.05) and independently predicted higher stride time variability (ps < 0.05), together explaining 21.9% of variance. Results suggest that higher stride time variability with older age may be produced by a shift from sagittal plane variability to frontal plane variability at the ankle.
2020
Aging; Sex differences; Gait; Motor variability; Frontal plane
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
job_2020.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 540.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
540.6 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/281759
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact