The integration of no-network planning alternatives into distribution system planning tools requires a proper modelling of load and generation behaviours within network calculation. To capture the operational aspects that can affect the planning stage, the time variability of demand and generation has to be explicitly represented in the planning calculations. Moreover, to reduce the computational burden and take account of the uncertain production and consumption of electricity, stochastic models have to be implemented. Two approaches are commonly proposed in the scientific literature: the clustering of demand and generation variability in a year taking account of the occurrence probability of each cluster, and the identification of typical daily profiles that characterise the weekly and seasonal customers’ behaviour during a year modelling their uncertainties through suitable probability density functions. In the paper, the comparison of these two approaches have been shown, underlining qualities and faults (e.g., accuracy, computational time burden, their applicability). The comparison has been performed considering a realistic distribution network, in presence of distributed generation (DG).

Comparison of models and tools for distribution planning

Gianni Celli
;
Fabrizio Pilo;Simona Ruggeri;
2019-01-01

Abstract

The integration of no-network planning alternatives into distribution system planning tools requires a proper modelling of load and generation behaviours within network calculation. To capture the operational aspects that can affect the planning stage, the time variability of demand and generation has to be explicitly represented in the planning calculations. Moreover, to reduce the computational burden and take account of the uncertain production and consumption of electricity, stochastic models have to be implemented. Two approaches are commonly proposed in the scientific literature: the clustering of demand and generation variability in a year taking account of the occurrence probability of each cluster, and the identification of typical daily profiles that characterise the weekly and seasonal customers’ behaviour during a year modelling their uncertainties through suitable probability density functions. In the paper, the comparison of these two approaches have been shown, underlining qualities and faults (e.g., accuracy, computational time burden, their applicability). The comparison has been performed considering a realistic distribution network, in presence of distributed generation (DG).
2019
978-2-9602415-0-1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CIRED 2019 - 2317.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 426.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
426.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/296800
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact