This article examines the dispute settlement mechanism established under the Com- prehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the European Union and Canada. The mechanism in question is compared to other existing arbitral tribu- nals, such as those established under national BITs of EU Member States, and those adopted by the United States and Canada in their respective model BIT. NAFTA is also used as a term of comparison. The paper argues that in light of the innovations introduced by CETA, the latter creates a very advanced and carefully drafted system.
Investment Disputes under CETA: from Gold Standards to Best Practices?
Luca Pantaleo
2017-01-01
Abstract
This article examines the dispute settlement mechanism established under the Com- prehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the European Union and Canada. The mechanism in question is compared to other existing arbitral tribu- nals, such as those established under national BITs of EU Member States, and those adopted by the United States and Canada in their respective model BIT. NAFTA is also used as a term of comparison. The paper argues that in light of the innovations introduced by CETA, the latter creates a very advanced and carefully drafted system.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
EBLR.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale
Dimensione
2.79 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.79 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.