The article aims to question the mainstream theory that the ‘enigmatic’ actio de pastu pecoris would only be admissible in cases of fraudulent introduction of animals into other people’s funds, and solely in the case of sheep or flocks. See D. 19, 5, 14, 3 (immisso pecore), D. 10, 4, 9, 1 (si dolo pecus immisi), D. 9, 2, 39 pr. (quoniam si quid ex ea re damnum cepit, habet proprias actiones). It is also argued that the hypotheses of pastus pecoris and noctu furtim frugem pavisse ac secuisse cannot refer to a single provision.
L'enigmatica actio de pastu pecoris: da Huvelin a noi
Sanna, Maria Virginia
2020-01-01
Abstract
The article aims to question the mainstream theory that the ‘enigmatic’ actio de pastu pecoris would only be admissible in cases of fraudulent introduction of animals into other people’s funds, and solely in the case of sheep or flocks. See D. 19, 5, 14, 3 (immisso pecore), D. 10, 4, 9, 1 (si dolo pecus immisi), D. 9, 2, 39 pr. (quoniam si quid ex ea re damnum cepit, habet proprias actiones). It is also argued that the hypotheses of pastus pecoris and noctu furtim frugem pavisse ac secuisse cannot refer to a single provision.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SANNA, Koinonia.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
315.43 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
315.43 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNICA sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono protetti da diritto d'autore, salvo diversa indicazione.
