We analyse the relations between defensive medicine, medical malpractice insurance and litigious behaviours, by an evolutionary game between physicians and patients. When medical treatment fails, patients may suit the physician and seek compensation. Conversely, physicians may prevent negligence charges by practising defensive medicine or by buying medical malpractice insurance. The latter choice transfers the risk of litigation from the physician to the insurer. By studying the population dynamics, we intend to describe how clinical and legal risks can shape the interactions between healthcare providers and patients, and how this can affect the diffusion and the price of medical malpractice insurance.

Defensive medicine, liability insurance and malpractice litigation in an evolutionary model

Fiori Maccioni A;
2019-01-01

Abstract

We analyse the relations between defensive medicine, medical malpractice insurance and litigious behaviours, by an evolutionary game between physicians and patients. When medical treatment fails, patients may suit the physician and seek compensation. Conversely, physicians may prevent negligence charges by practising defensive medicine or by buying medical malpractice insurance. The latter choice transfers the risk of litigation from the physician to the insurer. By studying the population dynamics, we intend to describe how clinical and legal risks can shape the interactions between healthcare providers and patients, and how this can affect the diffusion and the price of medical malpractice insurance.
2019
Malpractice litigation; Liability insurance; Defensive medicine
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fiori-Maccioni et al NARWA (2019).pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 1.77 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.77 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/316808
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact