Laccase from Aspergillus sp. (LC) was immobilized within Fe-BTC and ZIF-zni metal organic frameworks through a one-pot synthesis carried out under mild conditions (room temperature and aqueous solution). The Fe-BTC, ZIF-zni MOFs, and the LC@Fe-BTC, LC@ZIF-zni immobilized LC samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The kinetic parameters (KM and Vmax) and the specific activity of the free and immobilized laccase were determined. Immobilized LCs resulted in a lower specific activity compared with that of the free LC (7.7 µmol min-1 mg-1). However, LC@ZIF-zni was almost 10 times more active than LC@Fe-BTC (1.32 µmol min-1 mg-1 vs 0.17 µmol min-1 mg-1) and only 5.8 times less active than free LC. The effect of enzyme loading showed that LC@Fe-BTC had an optimal loading of 45.2 mg g-1, at higher enzyme loadings the specific activity decreased. In contrast, the specific activity of LC@ZIF-zni increased linearly over the loading range investigated. The storage stability of LC@Fe-BTC was low with a significant decrease in activity after 5 days, while LC@ZIF retained up to 50% of its original activity after 30 days storage. The difference in activity and stability between LC@Fe-BTC and LC@ZIF-zni is likely due to release of Fe3+ and the low stability of Fe-BTC MOF. Together, these results indicate that ZIF-zni is a superior support for the immobilization of laccase.

Enzyme immobilization on metal organic frameworks: Laccase from Aspergillus sp. is better adapted to ZIF-zni rather than Fe-BTC

Tocco D.
Primo
;
Carucci C.
Secondo
;
Todde D.;Sanjust E.
Penultimo
;
Salis A.
Ultimo
2021-01-01

Abstract

Laccase from Aspergillus sp. (LC) was immobilized within Fe-BTC and ZIF-zni metal organic frameworks through a one-pot synthesis carried out under mild conditions (room temperature and aqueous solution). The Fe-BTC, ZIF-zni MOFs, and the LC@Fe-BTC, LC@ZIF-zni immobilized LC samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The kinetic parameters (KM and Vmax) and the specific activity of the free and immobilized laccase were determined. Immobilized LCs resulted in a lower specific activity compared with that of the free LC (7.7 µmol min-1 mg-1). However, LC@ZIF-zni was almost 10 times more active than LC@Fe-BTC (1.32 µmol min-1 mg-1 vs 0.17 µmol min-1 mg-1) and only 5.8 times less active than free LC. The effect of enzyme loading showed that LC@Fe-BTC had an optimal loading of 45.2 mg g-1, at higher enzyme loadings the specific activity decreased. In contrast, the specific activity of LC@ZIF-zni increased linearly over the loading range investigated. The storage stability of LC@Fe-BTC was low with a significant decrease in activity after 5 days, while LC@ZIF retained up to 50% of its original activity after 30 days storage. The difference in activity and stability between LC@Fe-BTC and LC@ZIF-zni is likely due to release of Fe3+ and the low stability of Fe-BTC MOF. Together, these results indicate that ZIF-zni is a superior support for the immobilization of laccase.
2021
laccase; enzyme; metal organic frameworks; biocatalysis: Enzyme Immobilization
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tocco et al 2021 Enzyme immobilization on metal organic frameworks- Laccase from Aspergillus sp. is better adapted to ZIF-zni rather than Fe-BTC.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 4.8 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.8 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Tocco et al accepted manuscript .pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione 1.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.59 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/323359
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact