Individuating the logic of scientific discovery appears a hopeless enterprise. Less hopeless is trying to figure out a logical way to model the epistemic attitude distinguishing the practice of scientists. In this paper, we claim that classical logic cannot play such a descriptive role. We propose, instead, one of the three-valued logics in the Kleene family that is often classified as the less attractive one, namely Hallden's logic. By providing it with an appropriate epistemic interpretation, we can informally model the scientific attitude.
A Logic for a Critical Attitude?
Stefano Bonzio
2022-01-01
Abstract
Individuating the logic of scientific discovery appears a hopeless enterprise. Less hopeless is trying to figure out a logical way to model the epistemic attitude distinguishing the practice of scientists. In this paper, we claim that classical logic cannot play such a descriptive role. We propose, instead, one of the three-valued logics in the Kleene family that is often classified as the less attractive one, namely Hallden's logic. By providing it with an appropriate epistemic interpretation, we can informally model the scientific attitude.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A logic for a critical attitude?.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
340.35 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
340.35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.