This is a critical reflection on the Adjective Check List scales of measure for masculine (Mas) and feminine (Fem) orientation (Gough et al., 1981), based on a sample of Italian homosexuals (45 males and 52 females). Method: The research’s design of a factorial type among the subjects with a non-equivalent control group (43 heterosexual males and 49 heterosexual females). In the attempt to verify the hypothetical existence of gender crossed characteristics of male and female homosexual orientation (elevated scores to the Fem for the homosexual males and elevated scores to the Mas for the homosexual females) – as it is highlighted in the literature of reference (Clingman and Fowler, 1976; Evans, 1971) – it has been possible, through a factorial Manova 2x2 carried out on the dimensions under analysis (with sex and sexual orientation as between factors) to find the stereotypical nature of the adjectives which are part of the scales. Results: The study broadens the reflections on the acquisition process of sexual identity regarding gender and role – constructions which appear to be related not only to the childhood, but also to complex interpersonal affective regulation processes (Lichtenberg, 1989; Benjamin, 1995; Mitchell, 1993, 2002; Stern, 2005). Conclusion: The research considers the possibility of modernization and updating of the existing methods of measure, which are old-fashioned and therefore little sensitive at understanding the social-relational and affective transformations that involve the personality scales under examination.

Towards the deconstruction of gender role categories: a critical analysis of the Adjective Check List scales of measure for masculine and feminine orientation

LAMPIS, JESSICA;CARTA, STEFANO MARIANO
2008-01-01

Abstract

This is a critical reflection on the Adjective Check List scales of measure for masculine (Mas) and feminine (Fem) orientation (Gough et al., 1981), based on a sample of Italian homosexuals (45 males and 52 females). Method: The research’s design of a factorial type among the subjects with a non-equivalent control group (43 heterosexual males and 49 heterosexual females). In the attempt to verify the hypothetical existence of gender crossed characteristics of male and female homosexual orientation (elevated scores to the Fem for the homosexual males and elevated scores to the Mas for the homosexual females) – as it is highlighted in the literature of reference (Clingman and Fowler, 1976; Evans, 1971) – it has been possible, through a factorial Manova 2x2 carried out on the dimensions under analysis (with sex and sexual orientation as between factors) to find the stereotypical nature of the adjectives which are part of the scales. Results: The study broadens the reflections on the acquisition process of sexual identity regarding gender and role – constructions which appear to be related not only to the childhood, but also to complex interpersonal affective regulation processes (Lichtenberg, 1989; Benjamin, 1995; Mitchell, 1993, 2002; Stern, 2005). Conclusion: The research considers the possibility of modernization and updating of the existing methods of measure, which are old-fashioned and therefore little sensitive at understanding the social-relational and affective transformations that involve the personality scales under examination.
2008
gender role categories; Adjective Check List
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/35213
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact