The possibility to apply by analogy art. 351 TFEU to agreements concluded by the Member States after the deadline set out in the provision yet before the granting of a new competence to the Union has long been discussed by the scholarship. However, until very recently, the Court of Justice had always found a way to avoid the question. In Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v HF, the Court has adopted a restrictive interpretation of the provision in question, thus ruling out its application by analogy.
The Court of Justice finally rules on the analogical application of Art. 351 TFEU: end of the story?
Pantaleo, Luca
2022-01-01
Abstract
The possibility to apply by analogy art. 351 TFEU to agreements concluded by the Member States after the deadline set out in the provision yet before the granting of a new competence to the Union has long been discussed by the scholarship. However, until very recently, the Court of Justice had always found a way to avoid the question. In Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v HF, the Court has adopted a restrictive interpretation of the provision in question, thus ruling out its application by analogy.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
EP_EF_2022_H_004_Luca_Pantaleo_00603.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
versione editoriale
Dimensione
179.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
179.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.