The possibility to apply by analogy art. 351 TFEU to agreements concluded by the Member States after the deadline set out in the provision yet before the granting of a new competence to the Union has long been discussed by the scholarship. However, until very recently, the Court of Justice had always found a way to avoid the question. In Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v HF, the Court has adopted a restrictive interpretation of the provision in question, thus ruling out its application by analogy.

The Court of Justice finally rules on the analogical application of Art. 351 TFEU: end of the story?

Pantaleo, Luca
2022-01-01

Abstract

The possibility to apply by analogy art. 351 TFEU to agreements concluded by the Member States after the deadline set out in the provision yet before the granting of a new competence to the Union has long been discussed by the scholarship. However, until very recently, the Court of Justice had always found a way to avoid the question. In Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v HF, the Court has adopted a restrictive interpretation of the provision in question, thus ruling out its application by analogy.
2022
Article 351 TFEU; prior agreements; Member States international obligations; treaty conflict; conflict clause; analogical application
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EP_EF_2022_H_004_Luca_Pantaleo_00603.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 179.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
179.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/354698
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact