The "Strøbye et Rosenlind" and "Caamaño Valle" judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights respectively on February 2, 2021 and May 9, 2021, revisit the right to vote of people with mental disabilities. They both specify the conditions under which restrictions on the right to vote can be applied to people with intellectual disabilities. These judgments confirm a wide (but incomplete) margin of appreciation granted to Contracting States in placing limitations on the exercise of this fundamental right.

LES PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES MENTALES POSSÈDENT-ELLES (ENCORE) UN DROIT DE VOTE DANS LE SYSTEME DE LA CONVENTION EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ?,

SEATZU, FRANCESCO
2022-01-01

Abstract

The "Strøbye et Rosenlind" and "Caamaño Valle" judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights respectively on February 2, 2021 and May 9, 2021, revisit the right to vote of people with mental disabilities. They both specify the conditions under which restrictions on the right to vote can be applied to people with intellectual disabilities. These judgments confirm a wide (but incomplete) margin of appreciation granted to Contracting States in placing limitations on the exercise of this fundamental right.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022_2_la_comunita_internazionale_pp_263_274.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 2.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.03 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/375483
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact