The "Strøbye et Rosenlind" and "Caamaño Valle" judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights respectively on February 2, 2021 and May 9, 2021, revisit the right to vote of people with mental disabilities. They both specify the conditions under which restrictions on the right to vote can be applied to people with intellectual disabilities. These judgments confirm a wide (but incomplete) margin of appreciation granted to Contracting States in placing limitations on the exercise of this fundamental right.
LES PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES MENTALES POSSÈDENT-ELLES (ENCORE) UN DROIT DE VOTE DANS LE SYSTEME DE LA CONVENTION EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ?,
SEATZU, FRANCESCO
2022-01-01
Abstract
The "Strøbye et Rosenlind" and "Caamaño Valle" judgments, delivered by the European Court of Human Rights respectively on February 2, 2021 and May 9, 2021, revisit the right to vote of people with mental disabilities. They both specify the conditions under which restrictions on the right to vote can be applied to people with intellectual disabilities. These judgments confirm a wide (but incomplete) margin of appreciation granted to Contracting States in placing limitations on the exercise of this fundamental right.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2022_2_la_comunita_internazionale_pp_263_274.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
2.03 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.03 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNICA sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono protetti da diritto d'autore, salvo diversa indicazione.
