This research evaluated the impact of four nitrogen (N) fertilizer management systems on nitrate losses in an irrigated forage system under Mediterranean conditions within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ). The experiment was conducted from June 2009 to May 2012 in an intensive dairy cattle farm that produces silage maize and Italian ryegrass in a double cropping system. A monthly monitoring of the nitrate concentrations in the soil solution was carried out using 10cm diameter disk lysimeters. The N fertilization systems had a target N application of 316 and 130kgha-1 for maize and Italian ryegrass, respectively. Four systems were compared: cattle manure (MA); cattle slurry (SL); cattle slurry+mineral N fertilizer (SM); mineral N fertilization (MI). A clear seasonal dynamics of nitrate concentration was observed in the three years and was similar among treatments, with maximum occurring in autumn-winter. On average, at soil depths between 50 and 90cm, nitrate concentrations in the soil solution were intermediate for the MI treatment (146±10.4mgL-1), in between those of SL or SM (202±11.3 and 164±9.4mgL-1, respectively) and MA (78±4.9mgL-1). Despite the high average concentrations, only in some sampling dates the nitrate concentration was significantly higher than 50mgL-1. The estimated annual N leaching losses below 90cm soil depth ranged from 42 (MA) to 110 (SL)kgNha-1. These findings highlighted that, under Mediterranean conditions and with the N input rates, nitrate leaching in autumn-winter cannot be easily controlled through N fertilizer management because it is mainly associated to the natural water surplus and the low N uptake from the winter crop. The cattle manure has proved to be the most conservative in terms of N leaching, while replacing organic with mineral sources of N did not reduce nitrate leaching.

Replacing organic with mineral N fertilization does not reduce nitrate leaching in double crop forage systems under Mediterranean conditions

Carletti A.;
2016-01-01

Abstract

This research evaluated the impact of four nitrogen (N) fertilizer management systems on nitrate losses in an irrigated forage system under Mediterranean conditions within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ). The experiment was conducted from June 2009 to May 2012 in an intensive dairy cattle farm that produces silage maize and Italian ryegrass in a double cropping system. A monthly monitoring of the nitrate concentrations in the soil solution was carried out using 10cm diameter disk lysimeters. The N fertilization systems had a target N application of 316 and 130kgha-1 for maize and Italian ryegrass, respectively. Four systems were compared: cattle manure (MA); cattle slurry (SL); cattle slurry+mineral N fertilizer (SM); mineral N fertilization (MI). A clear seasonal dynamics of nitrate concentration was observed in the three years and was similar among treatments, with maximum occurring in autumn-winter. On average, at soil depths between 50 and 90cm, nitrate concentrations in the soil solution were intermediate for the MI treatment (146±10.4mgL-1), in between those of SL or SM (202±11.3 and 164±9.4mgL-1, respectively) and MA (78±4.9mgL-1). Despite the high average concentrations, only in some sampling dates the nitrate concentration was significantly higher than 50mgL-1. The estimated annual N leaching losses below 90cm soil depth ranged from 42 (MA) to 110 (SL)kgNha-1. These findings highlighted that, under Mediterranean conditions and with the N input rates, nitrate leaching in autumn-winter cannot be easily controlled through N fertilizer management because it is mainly associated to the natural water surplus and the low N uptake from the winter crop. The cattle manure has proved to be the most conservative in terms of N leaching, while replacing organic with mineral sources of N did not reduce nitrate leaching.
2016
Cattle slurry
Disk lysimeter
Italian ryegrass
Manure
Nitrate Vulnerable Zone
Silage maize
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/384452
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact