Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new surgical technique for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), consisting of localized PPV near the retinal break(s), without infusion line, associated with a drainage of subretinal fluid and cryoretinopexy. Methods: Multicentric prospective study conducted at the University Hospital of Cagliari and IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma. Twenty eyes affected by RRD with the causative retinal break(s) in the superior meridians were enrolled between February 2022 and June 2022. Patients with cataract ≥3, aphakia, significant posterior capsule opacification, giant retinal tears, retinal dialysis, history of trauma and PVR ≥C2 were excluded. All eyes underwent a two-port 25-gauge PPV with localized removal of the vitreous surrounding retinal break(s), followed by 20% SF6 injection and cryopexy. The surgical time was recorded for each procedure. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured at baseline and postoperative 6 months. Results: Primary anatomic success at 6 months was achieved by 85% of patients. No complications occurred, except for three (15%) retinal re-detachments. The average surgical time was 8.61 ± 2.16 min. Overall, the difference between pre- and last postoperative mean BCVA was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Two-port dry PPV demonstrated safety and efficacy for the treatment of RRD, reaching an 85% of anatomical success rate. Although further studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy and long-term benefit of this treatment, we believe that this surgical technique could be considered a valid and safe alternative for the management of primary RRD.

Two-port dry vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a pilot study.

Peiretti E
Primo
;
Tatti F;Mangoni L;Siotto Pintor E;Iovino C;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new surgical technique for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), consisting of localized PPV near the retinal break(s), without infusion line, associated with a drainage of subretinal fluid and cryoretinopexy. Methods: Multicentric prospective study conducted at the University Hospital of Cagliari and IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma. Twenty eyes affected by RRD with the causative retinal break(s) in the superior meridians were enrolled between February 2022 and June 2022. Patients with cataract ≥3, aphakia, significant posterior capsule opacification, giant retinal tears, retinal dialysis, history of trauma and PVR ≥C2 were excluded. All eyes underwent a two-port 25-gauge PPV with localized removal of the vitreous surrounding retinal break(s), followed by 20% SF6 injection and cryopexy. The surgical time was recorded for each procedure. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured at baseline and postoperative 6 months. Results: Primary anatomic success at 6 months was achieved by 85% of patients. No complications occurred, except for three (15%) retinal re-detachments. The average surgical time was 8.61 ± 2.16 min. Overall, the difference between pre- and last postoperative mean BCVA was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Two-port dry PPV demonstrated safety and efficacy for the treatment of RRD, reaching an 85% of anatomical success rate. Although further studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy and long-term benefit of this treatment, we believe that this surgical technique could be considered a valid and safe alternative for the management of primary RRD.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/402203
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact