We revisit the impact of early dark energy (EDE) on galaxy clustering using BOSS galaxy power spectra, analyzed using the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure (LSS) and anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck. Recent studies found that these data place stringent constraints on the maximum abundance of EDE allowed in the Universe. We argue here that their conclusions are a consequence of their choice of priors on the EDE parameter space, rather than any disagreement between the data and the model. For example, when considering EFT-LSS, CMB, and high-redshift supernovae data we find the EDE and ACDM models can provide statistically indistinguishable fits (Delta chi(2) = 0.12) with a relatively large value for the maximum fraction of energy density in the EDE (f(ede) = 0.09) and Hubble constant (H-0 = 71 km/s/Mpc) in the EDE model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the constraining power added from the inclusion of EFT-LSS traces to the potential tension between the power-spectrum amplitudes A s derived from BOSS and from Planck that arises even within the context of ACDM. Until this is better understood, caution should be used when interpreting EFT-BOSS Planck constraints to models beyond ACDM. These findings suggest that EDE still provides a potential resolution to the Hubble tension and that it is worthwhile to test the predictions of EDE with future datasets and further study its theoretical possibilities.
Early dark energy is not excluded by current large-scale structure data
Murgia, Riccardo
2021-01-01
Abstract
We revisit the impact of early dark energy (EDE) on galaxy clustering using BOSS galaxy power spectra, analyzed using the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure (LSS) and anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck. Recent studies found that these data place stringent constraints on the maximum abundance of EDE allowed in the Universe. We argue here that their conclusions are a consequence of their choice of priors on the EDE parameter space, rather than any disagreement between the data and the model. For example, when considering EFT-LSS, CMB, and high-redshift supernovae data we find the EDE and ACDM models can provide statistically indistinguishable fits (Delta chi(2) = 0.12) with a relatively large value for the maximum fraction of energy density in the EDE (f(ede) = 0.09) and Hubble constant (H-0 = 71 km/s/Mpc) in the EDE model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the constraining power added from the inclusion of EFT-LSS traces to the potential tension between the power-spectrum amplitudes A s derived from BOSS and from Planck that arises even within the context of ACDM. Until this is better understood, caution should be used when interpreting EFT-BOSS Planck constraints to models beyond ACDM. These findings suggest that EDE still provides a potential resolution to the Hubble tension and that it is worthwhile to test the predictions of EDE with future datasets and further study its theoretical possibilities.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PhysRevD.103.123542.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
808.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
808.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
2009.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione
1.85 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.85 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


