Tis paper focuses, in particular, on some fragments from book 23 of Ulpian’s commentary ad edictum, in which the hypothesis of an action modelled on elements from the clauses of the edict of deiectum vel effusum and positum seems to emerge. We propose, therefore, to investigate the elements of this tertium genus, highlighting the differences between Ulpianus’ approach and that of the republican jurist Servius.
Riflessioni di Ulpiano intorno ad un tertium genus tra deiectum vel effusum e positum aut suspensum
Benedetto Monteleone
2024-01-01
Abstract
Tis paper focuses, in particular, on some fragments from book 23 of Ulpian’s commentary ad edictum, in which the hypothesis of an action modelled on elements from the clauses of the edict of deiectum vel effusum and positum seems to emerge. We propose, therefore, to investigate the elements of this tertium genus, highlighting the differences between Ulpianus’ approach and that of the republican jurist Servius.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
07_Monteleone (1).pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
694 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
694 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNICA sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono protetti da diritto d'autore, salvo diversa indicazione.
