Tis paper focuses, in particular, on some fragments from book 23 of Ulpian’s commentary ad edictum, in which the hypothesis of an action modelled on elements from the clauses of the edict of deiectum vel effusum and positum seems to emerge. We propose, therefore, to investigate the elements of this tertium genus, highlighting the differences between Ulpianus’ approach and that of the republican jurist Servius.

Riflessioni di Ulpiano intorno ad un tertium genus tra deiectum vel effusum e positum aut suspensum

Benedetto Monteleone
2024-01-01

Abstract

Tis paper focuses, in particular, on some fragments from book 23 of Ulpian’s commentary ad edictum, in which the hypothesis of an action modelled on elements from the clauses of the edict of deiectum vel effusum and positum seems to emerge. We propose, therefore, to investigate the elements of this tertium genus, highlighting the differences between Ulpianus’ approach and that of the republican jurist Servius.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
07_Monteleone (1).pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 694 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
694 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/440526
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact