Recent work has proposed neural network pruning techniques to reduce the size of a network while preserving robustness against adversarial examples, i.e., well-crafted inputs inducing a misclassification. These methods, which we refer to as adversarial pruning methods, involve complex and articulated designs, making it difficult to analyze the differences and establish a fair and accurate comparison. In this work, we overcome these issues by surveying current adversarial pruning methods and proposing a novel robustness-oriented taxonomy to categorize them based on two main dimensions: the pipeline, defining when to prune; and the specifics, defining how to prune. We then highlight the limitations of current empirical analyses and propose a novel, fair evaluation benchmark to address them. We finally conduct an empirical re-evaluation of current adversarial pruning methods and discuss the results, highlighting the shared traits of top-performing adversarial pruning methods, as well as common issues. We welcome contributions in our publicly-available benchmark at https: //github.com/pralab/AdversarialPruningBenchmark.
Adversarial pruning: A survey and benchmark of pruning methods for adversarial robustness
Giorgio Piras
Primo
;Maura Pintor;Ambra Demontis;Battista Biggio;Giorgio Giacinto;Fabio RoliUltimo
2025-01-01
Abstract
Recent work has proposed neural network pruning techniques to reduce the size of a network while preserving robustness against adversarial examples, i.e., well-crafted inputs inducing a misclassification. These methods, which we refer to as adversarial pruning methods, involve complex and articulated designs, making it difficult to analyze the differences and establish a fair and accurate comparison. In this work, we overcome these issues by surveying current adversarial pruning methods and proposing a novel robustness-oriented taxonomy to categorize them based on two main dimensions: the pipeline, defining when to prune; and the specifics, defining how to prune. We then highlight the limitations of current empirical analyses and propose a novel, fair evaluation benchmark to address them. We finally conduct an empirical re-evaluation of current adversarial pruning methods and discuss the results, highlighting the shared traits of top-performing adversarial pruning methods, as well as common issues. We welcome contributions in our publicly-available benchmark at https: //github.com/pralab/AdversarialPruningBenchmark.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0031320325004480-main (2).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
2.34 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.34 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
2409.01249v1 (4).pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione pre-print
Dimensione
646.21 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
646.21 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.