The role of genetic factors in cluster headache etiology, suggested by familial and twin studies, remains ill-defined, with the exact pathophysiological mechanisms still largely elusive. This systematic review aims to synthesize current knowledge on cluster headache genetics and explore its implications for personalized treatment and prediction of treatment response. Thus, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases and reference lists of identified research articles, meta-Analyses, and reviews to identify relevant studies up to 10 July 2024. The quality of the evidence was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case control studies and NIH Quality Assessment tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. The protocol of this study was registered via the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/cd4s3). Fifty-one studies were selected for the qualitative synthesis: 34 candidate gene studies, 5 GWAS, 7 gene expression studies, 4 pharmacogenetic association studies, and 1 whole genome sequencing study. The bulk of genetic evidence in cluster headache underscores the involvement of genes associated with chronobiological regulation. The most studied gene in cluster headache is the HCRTR2, which is expressed in the hypothalamus; however, findings across studies continue to be inconclusive. Recent GWAS have uncovered novel risk loci for cluster headache, marking a significant advancement for the field. Nevertheless, there remains a need to investigate various genes involved in specific mechanisms and pathways.

Genomics and pharmacogenomics of cluster headache: Implications for personalized management? A systematic review

Isayeva U.
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Paribello P.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Ginelli E.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Pisanu C.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Carpiniello B.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Squassina A.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Manchia M.
Ultimo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2025-01-01

Abstract

The role of genetic factors in cluster headache etiology, suggested by familial and twin studies, remains ill-defined, with the exact pathophysiological mechanisms still largely elusive. This systematic review aims to synthesize current knowledge on cluster headache genetics and explore its implications for personalized treatment and prediction of treatment response. Thus, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases and reference lists of identified research articles, meta-Analyses, and reviews to identify relevant studies up to 10 July 2024. The quality of the evidence was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case control studies and NIH Quality Assessment tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. The protocol of this study was registered via the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/cd4s3). Fifty-one studies were selected for the qualitative synthesis: 34 candidate gene studies, 5 GWAS, 7 gene expression studies, 4 pharmacogenetic association studies, and 1 whole genome sequencing study. The bulk of genetic evidence in cluster headache underscores the involvement of genes associated with chronobiological regulation. The most studied gene in cluster headache is the HCRTR2, which is expressed in the hypothalamus; however, findings across studies continue to be inconclusive. Recent GWAS have uncovered novel risk loci for cluster headache, marking a significant advancement for the field. Nevertheless, there remains a need to investigate various genes involved in specific mechanisms and pathways.
2025
chronobiology; circadian rhythm; genetics; genome-wide association studies; lithium
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Isayeva_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 504.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
504.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/448115
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact