Organizational change is essential for business adaptability, yet its success depends on employees’ commitment to change. This study explores the role of psychological ownership and open and transparent communication in shaping commitment to change within family and non-family firms. Using moderated mediation modelling on data from 501 employees across 14 Italian firms, findings reveal that psychological ownership fully mediates the relationship between open and transparent communication and commitment to change, with distinct effects based on business status (i.e. family vs. non-family). In family firms, psychological ownership fosters affective commitment by strengthening emotional bonds and identification with the organization. In nonfamily firms, psychological ownership reinforces normative commitment by fostering a sense of duty and professional responsibility. These findings highlight the critical role of psychological ownership as a mediator between strategic communication and commitment to change. When employees develop a genuine sense of ownership over the change process, they are more motivated to accept and sustain it, regardless of whether the organization is family-owned or non-family-owned. These findings contribute to change management literature and provide practical suggestions for adapting transformation strategies to different business status.

Understanding Commitment to Change in Family and Non-Family Business: The Role of Psychological Ownership and Open and Transparent Communication

Roberta Pinna
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Michela Floris
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Fabio Corona
Data Curation
;
Cinzia Dessi
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Gianfranco Cicotto
Data Curation
2025-01-01

Abstract

Organizational change is essential for business adaptability, yet its success depends on employees’ commitment to change. This study explores the role of psychological ownership and open and transparent communication in shaping commitment to change within family and non-family firms. Using moderated mediation modelling on data from 501 employees across 14 Italian firms, findings reveal that psychological ownership fully mediates the relationship between open and transparent communication and commitment to change, with distinct effects based on business status (i.e. family vs. non-family). In family firms, psychological ownership fosters affective commitment by strengthening emotional bonds and identification with the organization. In nonfamily firms, psychological ownership reinforces normative commitment by fostering a sense of duty and professional responsibility. These findings highlight the critical role of psychological ownership as a mediator between strategic communication and commitment to change. When employees develop a genuine sense of ownership over the change process, they are more motivated to accept and sustain it, regardless of whether the organization is family-owned or non-family-owned. These findings contribute to change management literature and provide practical suggestions for adapting transformation strategies to different business status.
2025
Stewardship theory; Organizational change; commitment to change; open and transparent communication; psychological ownership; family and non-family business
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11584/448905
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact