This article aims to investigate the morphology of intellectual property in the era of algorithmic administration. Considering that the public administration may not be able to develop the necessary technologies in-house and will have to procure them on the market, some have argued that these rights could spur unprecedented dominance of private actors over the entire public decision-making process. Others, including case law, claim overall disclosure of source code to ensure transparency, freedom of information, and civic engagement, consistent with Open Government policies. This article leaves out the legal debate, on the qualification of source code as an administrative act, that recently took place in Italy. It aims to contribute to the debate on the related problems of source code accessibility, in order to understand whether intellectual property rights should succumb whenever technological solutions are presented in administrative activities.
L’articolo si propone di indagare la morfologia della proprietà in tellettuale nell’era dell’amministrazione algoritmica. Considerando che la pubblica amministrazione potrebbe non essere in grado di sviluppare internamente le tecno logie necessarie e dovrà procurarsele sul mercato, taluni hanno sostenuto che questi diritti potrebbero stimolare un predominio senza precedenti degli operatori privati sull’intero processo decisionale pubblico. Altri, compresa la giurisprudenza, riven dicano la divulgazione complessiva del codice sorgente per garantire trasparenza, libertà di informazione e impegno civico, in coerenza con le politiche di Open Go vernment. Questo articolo tralascia il dibattito giuridico, sulla qualificazione del co dice sorgente come atto amministrativo, recentemente avvenuto in Italia. Si propone di contribuire al dibattito sui problemi connessi dell’accessibilità al codice sorgente, al fine di comprendere se i diritti di proprietà intellettuale debbano soccombere ogni volta che si presentano soluzioni tecnologiche nelle attività amministrative.
La tutela del programma per elaboratore nell’amministrazione algoritmica
Alessia Palladino
2022-01-01
Abstract
This article aims to investigate the morphology of intellectual property in the era of algorithmic administration. Considering that the public administration may not be able to develop the necessary technologies in-house and will have to procure them on the market, some have argued that these rights could spur unprecedented dominance of private actors over the entire public decision-making process. Others, including case law, claim overall disclosure of source code to ensure transparency, freedom of information, and civic engagement, consistent with Open Government policies. This article leaves out the legal debate, on the qualification of source code as an administrative act, that recently took place in Italy. It aims to contribute to the debate on the related problems of source code accessibility, in order to understand whether intellectual property rights should succumb whenever technological solutions are presented in administrative activities.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
pubb_2022_tutela_software_Palladino_Alessia.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
162.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
162.12 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


