The research aims to show how the different solution that emerges from Ulp. D. 19.5.15 and Paul. D. 19.5.5.3 regarding the protection afforded to those who have performed a facere to bind the other party to a dare, which, however, is not carried out, namely the actio praescriptis verbis for Ulpian and the actio de dolo for Paul, may be evidence of a hidden controversy between Ulpian and Paul.
«Si faciam ut des»: una criptopolemica tra Ulpiano e Paolo?
Fercia, Riccardo
2025-01-01
Abstract
The research aims to show how the different solution that emerges from Ulp. D. 19.5.15 and Paul. D. 19.5.5.3 regarding the protection afforded to those who have performed a facere to bind the other party to a dare, which, however, is not carried out, namely the actio praescriptis verbis for Ulpian and the actio de dolo for Paul, may be evidence of a hidden controversy between Ulpian and Paul.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RICCARDO FERCIA.pdf
embargo fino al 29/12/2027
Tipologia:
versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione
718.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
718.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
